Literature DB >> 11842461

Emergency nurse practitioners: should the role be developed?

C Dealey1.   

Abstract

Trusts have to face a number of challenges in the provision of accident and emergency (A&E) services. One suggested way forward is to introduce the emergency nurse practitioner (ENP) role into A&E. However, this is not without controversy. Thus, this review has been undertaken in order to identify and assess any available evidence. A total of nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies fell into a number of categories, e.g. overall evaluation of the role, the use of radiography, and patient satisfaction. Several studies monitored transit times though A&E and there was some limited cost-benefit analysis. Overall, there was little difference found between the performance of ENPs in comparison with that of senior house officers (SHOs). The studies available for review are of poor quality, which limits the conclusions that can be made. At best, it would be reasonable to state that there is no evidence to demonstrate that ENPs are better or worse than SHOs in seeing, treating and discharging patients with minor injuries in A&E.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11842461     DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2001.10.22.9341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nurs        ISSN: 0966-0461


  2 in total

1.  Mapping the range and scope of emergency nurse practitioner services in the Northern and Yorkshire Region: a telephone survey.

Authors:  S Marr; K Steele; V Swallow; S Craggs; S Procter; J Newton; B Sen; A McNabb
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Cost-effectiveness of the SEN-concept: Specialized Emergency Nurses (SEN) treating ankle/foot injuries.

Authors:  Robert J Derksen; Veerle Mh Coupé; Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Veenings; Fred C Bakker
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.