Literature DB >> 11842018

Morphological plasticity in the tropical sponge Anthosigmella varians: responses to predators and wave energy.

Malcolm S Hill1, April L Hill.   

Abstract

The goal of the research presented here was to examine phenotypic plasticity exhibited by three morphotypes of the common Caribbean sponge Anthosigmella varians (Duchassaing & Michelotti). We were interested in examining the biotic (and, to a lesser extent, abiotic) factors responsible for branch production in this species. We also tested the hypothesis that the skeleton may serve an antipredator function in this sponge, focusing on vertebrate fish predators (i.e., angelfish) in this work. In transplant and caging experiments, unprotected forma varians replicates were immediately consumed by angelfish, while caged replicates persisted on the reef for several months. These findings support the hypothesis that predators (and not wave energy) restrict forma varians to lagoonal habitats. Branch production was not observed in A. varians forma incrustans when sponges were protected from predators or placed in predator-free, low-wave-energy environments. It is not clear from our work whether forma incrustans is capable of producing branches (i.e., whether branch production is a plastic trait in this morph). Additional field experiments demonstrated that A. varians forma varians increased spicule concentrations, compared to uninjured sponges, in response to artificial predation events, and A. varians forma rigida reduced spicule concentrations, compared to uncaged controls, when protected from predators. These findings indicate that spicule concentration is a plastic morphological trait that can be induced by damage, and that A. varians may be able to reduce spicule concentrations when environmental conditions change (e.g., in the absence of predators). The potential significance of inducible defenses and structural anti-predator defenses in sponges is discussed in relation to recent work on sponge chemical defenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11842018     DOI: 10.2307/1543225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Bull        ISSN: 0006-3185            Impact factor:   1.818


  9 in total

Review 1.  Principles of biofouling protection in marine sponges: a model for the design of novel biomimetic and bio-inspired coatings in the marine environment?

Authors:  Werner E G Müller; Xiaohong Wang; Peter Proksch; Carole C Perry; Ronald Osinga; Johan Gardères; Heinz C Schröder
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Allocation of chemical and structural defenses in the sponge Melophlus sarasinorum.

Authors:  Sven Rohde; Peter J Schupp
Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.171

3.  Do associated microbial abundances impact marine demosponge pumping rates and tissue densities?

Authors:  Jeremy B Weisz; Niels Lindquist; Christopher S Martens
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Discordance between morphological and molecular species boundaries among Caribbean species of the reef sponge Callyspongia.

Authors:  Melissa B DeBiasse; Michael E Hellberg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The skeletal amino acid composition of the marine demosponge Aplysina cavernicola.

Authors:  Susanne Ueberlein; Susanne Machill; Hendrik Niemann; Peter Proksch; Eike Brunner
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 5.118

6.  A review of bottom-up vs. top-down control of sponges on Caribbean fore-reefs: what's old, what's new, and future directions.

Authors:  Joseph R Pawlik; Tse-Lynn Loh; Steven E McMurray
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Harnessing natural recovery processes to improve restoration outcomes: an experimental assessment of sponge-mediated coral reef restoration.

Authors:  Brendan C Biggs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Environmental flow regimes for Dysidea avara sponges.

Authors:  Dominick Mendola; Sonia de Caralt; Maria J Uriz; Fred van den End; Johan L Van Leeuwen; René H Wijffels
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.727

9.  A Standardised Vocabulary for Identifying Benthic Biota and Substrata from Underwater Imagery: The CATAMI Classification Scheme.

Authors:  Franziska Althaus; Nicole Hill; Renata Ferrari; Luke Edwards; Rachel Przeslawski; Christine H L Schönberg; Rick Stuart-Smith; Neville Barrett; Graham Edgar; Jamie Colquhoun; Maggie Tran; Alan Jordan; Tony Rees; Karen Gowlett-Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.