Literature DB >> 11841462

EVA mouthguards: how thick should they be?

Bill Westerman1, Peter M Stringfellow, John A Eccleston.   

Abstract

A major consideration in the performance of mouthguards is their ability to absorb energy and reduce transmitted forces when impacted. This is especially important to participants in contact sports such as hockey or football. The thickness of mouthguard materials is directly related to energy absorption and inversely related to transmitted forces when impacted. However, wearer comfort is also an important factor in their use. Thicker mouthguards are not user-friendly. While thickness of material over incisal edges and cusps of teeth is critical, just how thick should a mouthguard be and especially in these two areas? Transmitted forces through different thicknesses of the most commonly used mouthguard material, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) (Shore A Hardness of 80) were compared when impacted with identical forces which were capable of damaging the oro-facial complex. The constant impact force used in the tests was produced by a pendulum and had an energy of 4.4 joules and a velocity of 3 meters per second. Improvements in energy absorption and reductions in transmitted forces were observed with increasing thickness. However, these improvements lessened when the mouthguard material thickness was greater than 4 mm. The results show that the optimal thickness for EVA mouthguard material with a Shore A Hardness of 80 is around 4 mm. Increased thickness, while improving performance marginally, results in less wearer comfort and acceptance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11841462     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.180103.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Traumatol        ISSN: 1600-4469            Impact factor:   3.333


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mouthguards in sport activities : history, physical properties and injury prevention effectiveness.

Authors:  Joseph J Knapik; Stephen W Marshall; Robyn B Lee; Salima S Darakjy; Sarah B Jones; Timothy A Mitchener; Georgia G delaCruz; Bruce H Jones
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  A preliminary report of structural changes to mouthguards during 1 season of high school football.

Authors:  Gianluca Del Rossi; Peter Lisman; Marco A Leyte-Vidal
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Shock Absorption Behavior of Elastic Polymers for Sports Mouthguards: An In Vitro Comparison of Thermoplastic Forming and Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Philipp Schewe; Ariadne Roehler; Sebastian Spintzyk; Fabian Huettig
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Multi-Material 3D Printing of a Customized Sports Mouth Guard: Proof-of-Concept Clinical Case.

Authors:  Alexey Unkovskiy; Fabian Huettig; Pablo Kraemer-Fernandez; Sebastian Spintzyk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Modeling the Contact Interaction of a Pair of Antagonist Teeth through Individual Protective Mouthguards of Different Geometric Configuration.

Authors:  Anna Kamenskikh; Alex G Kuchumov; Inessa Baradina
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Impact behaviour of 3D printed cellular structures for mouthguard applications.

Authors:  John Saunders; Maria Lißner; David Townsend; Nik Petrinic; Jeroen Bergmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Functional Anatomy, Impact Behavior and Energy Dissipation of the Peel of Citrus × limon: A Comparison of Citrus × limon and Citrus maxima.

Authors:  Maximilian Jentzsch; Sarah Becker; Marc Thielen; Thomas Speck
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05

8.  Force Distribution of a Novel Core-Reinforced Multilayered Mandibular Advancement Device.

Authors:  Hyo-Won Ahn; Soo-Yeon Lee; Hobeen Yu; Jin-Young Park; Kyung-A Kim; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Impact behaviour of freeze-dried and fresh pomelo (Citrus maxima) peel: influence of the hydration state.

Authors:  Marc Thielen; Thomas Speck; Robin Seidel
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  A Comparative Study of Shock Absorption Capacities of Custom Fabricated Mouthguards using a Triangulation Sensor.

Authors:  Rūta Sarac; Julia Helbig; Juliane Dräger; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.