Literature DB >> 11841419

Predicting long-term (> or = 5 years) event-free survival in multiple myeloma patients following planned tandem autotransplants.

Guido Tricot1, Trey Spencer, Jeffrey Sawyer, Dan Spoon, Raman Desikan, Athanasios Fassas, Ashraf Badros, Maurizio Zangari, Nikhil Munshi, Elias Anaissie, Amir Toor, Bart Barlogie.   

Abstract

Although outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) patients has improved significantly with the introduction of autotransplants (AT), the curability of this approach remained to be demonstrated. Therefore, we analysed outcome and prognostic factors using a logistic regression model in 515 consecutive newly diagnosed and previously treated patients intended to receive melphalan-based tandem transplants with follow up of > or = 5 years. One quarter of patients had event-free survivals (EFS) > or = 5 years with no further relapses seen after 7 years (46 patients on plateau). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with EFS > or = 5 years were absence of chromosome 11 and 13 abnormalities (odds ratio: 6.1), < or = 12 months of preceding standard-dose therapy (SDT) (OR: 2.6) and beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) level < or = 2.5 mg/l at time of first AT (OR: 1.7). Patients with only favourable variables (25%) had a 7-year EFS in excess of 35%, compared with 15% and 10%, respectively, with one (43%) or two unfavourable variables (27%), and 0% for 5% of patients with three unfavourable variables (P < 0.0001). Using a 1-year landmark analysis to allow for guaranteed time and thereby excluding early treatment failures, attaining a complete remission (CR) had no significant effect on long-term survival. Our data are consistent with cure in MM patients with a CR duration . or = 7 years and re-establishment of a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) phase in those with persistent evidence of disease post transplantation, but without disease progression > or = 7 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11841419     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  13 in total

1.  NY-ESO-1 is highly expressed in poor-prognosis multiple myeloma and induces spontaneous humoral and cellular immune responses.

Authors:  Frits van Rhee; Susann M Szmania; Fenghuang Zhan; Sushil K Gupta; Mindy Pomtree; Pei Lin; Ramesh B Batchu; Amberly Moreno; Guilio Spagnoli; John Shaughnessy; Guido Tricot
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The molecular classification of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Fenghuang Zhan; Yongsheng Huang; Simona Colla; James P Stewart; Ichiro Hanamura; Sushil Gupta; Joshua Epstein; Shmuel Yaccoby; Jeffrey Sawyer; Bart Burington; Elias Anaissie; Klaus Hollmig; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Guido Tricot; Frits van Rhee; Ronald Walker; Maurizio Zangari; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Suppression of abnormal karyotype predicts superior survival in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  V Arzoumanian; A Hoering; J Sawyer; F van Rhee; C Bailey; J Gurley; J D Shaughnessy; E Anaissie; J Crowley; B Barlogie
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Impact of Pre-transplant and Post-transplant Remission Status of Patients on Survival in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Rafiye Ciftciler; Hakan Goker; Yahya Buyukasık; Elifcan Aladag; Haluk Demiroglu
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 5.  Current status of stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Morie A Gertz; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Suzanne Hayman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-05

6.  Integrating cytogenetics and gene expression profiling in the molecular analysis of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  John D Shaughnessy; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 7.  Preclinical studies of novel targeted therapies.

Authors:  Teru Hideshima; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.722

8.  Nonmyeloablative unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation to treat patients with poor-risk, relapsed, or refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  George E Georges; Michael B Maris; David G Maloney; Brenda M Sandmaier; Mohamed L Sorror; Judith A Shizuru; Thoralf Lange; Edward D Agura; Benedetto Bruno; Peter A McSweeney; Michael A Pulsipher; Thomas R Chauncey; Marco Mielcarek; Barry E Storer; Rainer Storb
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  How we manage autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Morie A Gertz; David Dingli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Germline polymorphisms as modulators of cancer phenotypes.

Authors:  Patrick Tan
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.