Literature DB >> 11840889

Factors influencing career development of Australian general practitioners.

Brian C Shanley1, Katherine M Schulte, David Chant, Amy Jasper, Rod Wellard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors influencing career experiences and career choices made by former general practitioner registrars and to ascertain the reasons for these career decisions.
METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to all former registrars who completed the RACGP Training Program between 1994 and 1996. In addition 21 selected respondents were interviewed to obtain deeper insights into the comments recorded in returned questionnaires. All data were analysed for variance according to age, gender, state and locality of current general practice (i.e. whether metropolitan, rural or remote).
RESULTS: Altogether, 472 of the 988 questionnaires distributed were completed and returned. Of the respondents, 62.3% were female and 36.4% male; 68% were aged 30-34 years. Most (85.4%) lived with a partner, and 53.8% had at least one child. The majority (87.9%) of respondents gained their primary medical qualification in Australia. In addition to the FRACGP, 35.6% had also gained a Diploma of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. A number of other qualifications were recorded. Three-quarters (75.6%) of participants were currently working as group GPs, two-thirds of whom were employees; 5.9% were solo GPs; 3.4% locums; and 1.3% rural hospital medical officers. About one-third (32.4%) held a second job; most of these were in subspecialty clinics or attachments. Sixty-six percent were currently in metropolitan practice, 17.6% in rural and 2.7% in remote practice. The two highest ranked career options were continued professional development (70.8%) and performance of minor procedures (67.2%). Family and domestic circumstances stood out as the most influential factor for 79.0% of GPs. The majority (75.8%) felt that vocational training had exerted a positive effect on their careers through, for example, exposure to varied practice types and good overall clinical training.
CONCLUSION: While general practice experience in undergraduate education is an important factor in career choice, vocational training strongly influences preparation for, and the type of general practice undertaken. Nevertheless, family circumstances were reported as the most important consideration, although male and female work patterns differed markedly. It is concluded that these differences reflect different priorities in balancing professional and personal demands. The particular needs of the growing proportion of female practitioners have strong implications for future educational and workforce planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11840889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Fam Physician        ISSN: 0300-8495


  5 in total

1.  GP registrar well-being: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Peter Schattner; Dennis Mazalin; Ciaran Pier; Jo Wainer; Mee Yoke Ling
Journal:  Asia Pac Fam Med       Date:  2010-02-09

2.  The factors associated to psychosocial stress among general practitioners in Lithuania. Cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Giedrius Vanagas; Susanna Bihari-Axelsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Which positive factors give general practitioners job satisfaction and make general practice a rewarding career? A European multicentric qualitative research by the European general practice research network.

Authors:  B Le Floch; H Bastiaens; J Y Le Reste; H Lingner; R Hoffman; S Czachowski; R Assenova; T H Koskela; Z Klemenc-Ketis; P Nabbe; A Sowinska; T Montier; L Peremans
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Gender shift in realisation of preferred type of GP practice: longitudinal survey over the last 25 years.

Authors:  Tanja Maiorova; Fred Stevens; Lud van der Velden; Albert Scherpbier; Jouke van der Zee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  B Le Floch; H Bastiaens; J Y Le Reste; H Lingner; R D Hoffman; S Czachowski; R Assenova; T H Koskela; Z Klemenc-Ketis; P Nabbe; A Sowinska; T Montier; L Peremans
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.