Literature DB >> 11840220

Interoceptive and integrative contributions of forebrain and brainstem to energy balance control.

H J Grill1, J M Kaplan.   

Abstract

An anatomically distributed model of energy balance control contrasts with the widely held hypothalamic center model. The distributionist model is recommended by the observations that the caudal brainstem contains critical interoceptive, integrative and neurochemical mediating functions. A prominent example of interoceptive function is sensitivity to the adipose tissue-derived hormone, leptin. To complement the well established focus on hypothalamic leptin receptors (Ob-Rb), we describe an extensive distribution of Ob-Rb in the brainstem. These receptors, moreover, are functionally relevant given the intake suppressive effects of fourth-intracerebroventricular (i.c.v) and brainstem intraparenchymal (in dorsal vagal complex) delivery. A wide variety of intake relevant peptides receptors are found in hypothalamus, but these receptors are also widely distributed in the caudal brainstem. As an example of the functional relevance of these neurochemical mediators, we describe ingestive effects of ligands for melanocortin 3/4 and corticotrophin-releasing hormone receptors obtained with brainstem ventricular and parenchymal (dorsal vagal complex and parabrachial nucleus) delivery. It is clear that responses obtained from hypothalamic treatments can arise independently from stimulation of caudal brainstem receptors. We have used the chronic decerebrate preparation to ask whether the brainstem contains integrative substrates sufficient to mediate behavioral responses to variations in physiological state. The experiments reveal that the brainstem is indeed sufficient for the integration of taste and gastrointestinal signals that co-determine the size of meals in the short term. Decerebrate rats, however, do not respond to food deprivation or to reductions in the number of daily feeding opportunities. These results suggest that the brainstem in neural isolation from forebrain influence is not sufficient for ingestive response to systemic/metabolic signals that affect intake over the long term. The relative contribution of brainstem and forebrain substrates to long-term intake and body weight control in the neurologically intact animal, remains unclear. The data reviewed support a distributed anatomical model of energy balance and recommend increased attention to specific responses (behavioral, autonomic and endocrine) that are mediated by local (brainstem or forebrain) interoceptive and integrative processes, and those requiring bi-directional interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11840220     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  19 in total

Review 1.  Gustatory and reward brain circuits in the control of food intake.

Authors:  A J Oliveira-Maia; C D Roberts; S A Simon; M A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Neuronal control of energy homeostasis.

Authors:  Qian Gao; Tamas L Horvath
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Hindbrain leptin stimulation induces anorexia and hyperthermia mediated by hindbrain melanocortin receptors.

Authors:  Karolina P Skibicka; Harvey J Grill
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 4.  Brain circuits regulating energy homeostasis.

Authors:  Alfonso Abizaid; Tamas L Horvath
Journal:  Regul Pept       Date:  2008-03-25

5.  If I only had a whole brain: the importance of extrahypothalamic areas in the energy balance equation.

Authors:  Jill E Schneider
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Web-enabled feedback control over energy balance promotes an increase in physical activity and a reduction of body weight and disease risk in overweight sedentary adults.

Authors:  Lutz Erwin Kraushaar; Alexander Krämer
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2014-08

7.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ controls ingestive behavior, agouti-related protein, and neuropeptide Y mRNA in the arcuate hypothalamus.

Authors:  John T Garretson; Brett J W Teubner; Kevin L Grove; Almira Vazdarjanova; Vitaly Ryu; Timothy J Bartness
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Gustatory hedonic value: potential function for forebrain control of brainstem taste processing.

Authors:  Robert F Lundy
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Loss of pons-to-hypothalamic white matter tracks in brainstem obesity.

Authors:  J Q Purnell; D L Lahna; M H Samuels; W D Rooney; W F Hoffman
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 10.  Parabrachial coding of sapid sucrose: relevance to reward and obesity.

Authors:  Andras Hajnal; Ralph Norgren; Peter Kovacs
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.