Literature DB >> 11839883

The "window" of slow pathway conduction after ablation and recurrence of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Alan P Wimmer1, Michael L Shapiro.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Slow pathway (SP) conduction often persists following radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). An association between persistent SP conduction, as evidenced by discontinuous AV nodal conduction curves, and recurrent tachycardia has not been established. Of note, the segment of the curve attributable to SP conduction (the "window" of SP conduction) varies. This study examined whether the maximal post-ablation SP conduction window length differs in patients who later have recurrent tachycardia when compared with those who do not recur. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Electrophysiologic study data were compared in two groups who had undergone RF ablation of the SP for typical AVNRT at a single center from 1992-1998. The groups, consisting of seven known recurrences (Group A) and 50 non-recurrences confirmed through a follow-up survey and phone contact (Group B), were similar in gender proportion, age, baseline electrophysiologic data, and number of RF deliveries. Four patients (57%) from Group A and 26 (52%) from Group B exhibited discontinuous AV nodal conduction curves after ablation. The maximum post-ablation window lengths among patients with dual AV nodal physiology varied widely and similarly in the two groups, and the means did not significantly differ (53 +/- 47 msec in Group A vs. 36 +/- 31 msec in Group B; p=0.36).
CONCLUSION: Persistent SP conduction post-ablation in this series was a common finding not predictive of recurrence. No difference in the maximum SP conduction window post-ablation was evident between recurrences and non-recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11839883     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014183401028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  21 in total

1.  Selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Evidence for involvement of perinodal myocardium within the reentrant circuit.

Authors:  G N Kay; A E Epstein; S M Dailey; V J Plumb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Effect of residual slow pathway function on the time course of recurrences of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia after radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway.

Authors:  J D Hummel; S A Strickberger; B D Williamson; K C Man; E Daoud; M Niebauer; O Bakr; F Morady
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  M R Jazayeri; S L Hempe; J S Sra; A A Dhala; Z Blanck; S S Deshpande; B Avitall; D P Krum; C J Gilbert; M Akhtar
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Impact of the local atrial electrogram in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: ablation versus modification of the slow pathway.

Authors:  J Tebbenjohanns; D Pfeiffer; B Schumacher; M Manz; B Lüderitz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1995-04

5.  A direct midseptal approach to slow atrioventricular nodal pathway ablation.

Authors:  L M Epstein; M D Lesh; J C Griffin; R J Lee; M M Scheinman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Radiofrequency ablation of slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Do arrhythmia recurrences correlate with persistent slow pathway conduction or site of successful ablation?

Authors:  A S Manolis; P J Wang; N A Estes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Junctional tachycardia: a useful marker during radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  R K Thakur; G J Klein; R Yee; H W Stites
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Therapeutic end points for the treatment of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia by catheter-guided radiofrequency current.

Authors:  B D Lindsay; M K Chung; M C Gamache; R A Luke; K B Schechtman; J L Osborn; M E Cain
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Recurrent tachycardia after selective ablation of slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  S A Chen; T J Wu; C E Chiang; C T Tai; C W Chiou; K C Ueng; S H Lee; C C Cheng; Z C Wen; M S Chang
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Elimination of slow pathway conduction: an accurate indicator of clinical success after radiofrequency atrioventricular node modification.

Authors:  H G Li; G J Klein; H W Stites; M Zardini; C A Morillo; R K Thakur; R Yee
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Post-ablation prolongation of atrioventricular nodal refractory period is correlated with long-term success of cryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the case of the persistence of a residual jump.

Authors:  Joelci Tonet; Antonio De Sisti; Natalia Pardo Restrepo; Denis Raguin; Walid Amara; Manlio F Márquez; Philip Aouate; Xavier Waintraub; Faouzi Touil; Francoise Hidden-Lucet
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.900

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.