B Gleissner1, J Siehl, A Korfel, R Reinhardt, E Thiel. 1. Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Benjamin Franklin, Free University of Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany. gleisner@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cytologic evaluation of CSF does not consistently detect malignant cells in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). The potentially more sensitive molecular assessment of monoclonality has not been shown in CSF samples. METHODS: The authors studied nested PCR of the complementary determining region III (CDR III) on 76 CSF specimens of patients with PCNSL. Patients with systemic disseminated B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 17) and 17 patients with no history of lymphoma were compared. PCR products were evaluated by automated fluorescent fragment analysis (ALF). RESULTS: In 68 patients with PCNSL, the authors analyzed the first obtained CSF sample. Nevertheless, 60 patients were taking corticosteroids. In 16 PCNSL samples, amplifiable DNA was not yielded. Taking into account that at least two independent assays have to be performed, CDR III PCR consistently revealed monoclonal products in eight PCNSL and polyclonal results in 52 PCNSL specimens. CDR III PCR detected no monoclonal PCR products in patients without history of lymphoma. In 10 patients with PCNSL, the PCR result and the CSF cytology were discordant. Concerning therapeutic impact, leptomeningeal tumor spread did not predict tumor response in this group of patients with PCNSL. CONCLUSIONS: This study performed CDR III PCR as a routine diagnostic technique applicable even on CSF samples with low cell counts. These data present low incidence of leptomeningeal involvement in this subset of pretreated PCNSL patients. Because the CSF evaluation did not predict outcome in our patients, further analysis in patients with PCNSL should focus on CSF samples that are obtained very early after diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Cytologic evaluation of CSF does not consistently detect malignant cells in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). The potentially more sensitive molecular assessment of monoclonality has not been shown in CSF samples. METHODS: The authors studied nested PCR of the complementary determining region III (CDR III) on 76 CSF specimens of patients with PCNSL. Patients with systemic disseminated B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 17) and 17 patients with no history of lymphoma were compared. PCR products were evaluated by automated fluorescent fragment analysis (ALF). RESULTS: In 68 patients with PCNSL, the authors analyzed the first obtained CSF sample. Nevertheless, 60 patients were taking corticosteroids. In 16 PCNSL samples, amplifiable DNA was not yielded. Taking into account that at least two independent assays have to be performed, CDR III PCR consistently revealed monoclonal products in eight PCNSL and polyclonal results in 52 PCNSL specimens. CDR III PCR detected no monoclonal PCR products in patients without history of lymphoma. In 10 patients with PCNSL, the PCR result and the CSF cytology were discordant. Concerning therapeutic impact, leptomeningeal tumor spread did not predict tumor response in this group of patients with PCNSL. CONCLUSIONS: This study performed CDR III PCR as a routine diagnostic technique applicable even on CSF samples with low cell counts. These data present low incidence of leptomeningeal involvement in this subset of pretreated PCNSLpatients. Because the CSF evaluation did not predict outcome in our patients, further analysis in patients with PCNSL should focus on CSF samples that are obtained very early after diagnosis.
Authors: C L Davies; R Chinn; M Nelson; M Rasanesan; B Gazzard; T Powles; M Bower; J Stebbing Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Leon D Kaulen; Daniela Galluzzo; Pei Hui; Frank Barbiero; Philipp Karschnia; Anita Huttner; Robert Fulbright; Joachim M Baehring Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Robert B Nussenblatt; Chi-Chao Chan; Wyndham H Wilson; Jacob Hochman; Michael Gottesman Journal: Ocul Immunol Inflamm Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.070
Authors: Francisco-Javier Peñalver; Juan-Manuel Sancho; Adolfo de la Fuente; María-Teresa Olave; Alejandro Martín; Carlos Panizo; Elena Pérez; Antonio Salar; Alberto Orfao Journal: Haematologica Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Brian J Scott; Vanja C Douglas; Tarik Tihan; James L Rubenstein; S Andrew Josephson Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 18.302