K A Bradley1, C Maynard, D R Kivlahan, M B McDonell, S D Fihn. 1. Northwest Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington 98108, USA. willi@u.washington.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether responses to alcohol screening questionnaires predicted mortality in a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care population. METHOD: This study involved 5,703 male outpatients (mean age = 64) who were enrolled in General Internal Medicine clinics at three Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and returned mailed questionnaires in 1993-94. The two questionnaires included the CAGE and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) alcohol screening tests. Mortality was ascertained using the VA Beneficiary Identification and Record Locator System. Five-year crude and adjusted mortality rates were calculated for patients who screened positive and patients who screened negative on each alcohol screening test. RESULTS: The risk of mortality was increased among drinkers who scored > or = 8 on the full AUDIT (hazard ratio: 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.00) or the three AUDIT consumption questions (1.58; 1.11-2.27), after adjusting for age, smoking, sociodemographic characteristics and chronic illnesses. The risk of mortality was also increased among drinkers who reported drinking > or = 3 drinks daily (1.69; 1.28-2.22) or prior alcohol treatment (1.66; 1.27-2.17), in "fully adjusted" models. A positive CAGE score (> or = 2) was associated with significantly increased risk of mortality among drinkers in a model adjusted only for age and smoking (1.27; 1.02-1.58). Among nondrinkers, neither a positive CAGE score (> or = 2) nor report of prior alcohol treatment was associated with increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: VA outpatients who reported drinking during the previous year and who had a positive result on an alcohol screening test experienced higher mortality over the subsequent 5 years than did patients who screened negative.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether responses to alcohol screening questionnaires predicted mortality in a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care population. METHOD: This study involved 5,703 male outpatients (mean age = 64) who were enrolled in General Internal Medicine clinics at three Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and returned mailed questionnaires in 1993-94. The two questionnaires included the CAGE and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) alcohol screening tests. Mortality was ascertained using the VA Beneficiary Identification and Record Locator System. Five-year crude and adjusted mortality rates were calculated for patients who screened positive and patients who screened negative on each alcohol screening test. RESULTS: The risk of mortality was increased among drinkers who scored > or = 8 on the full AUDIT (hazard ratio: 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.00) or the three AUDIT consumption questions (1.58; 1.11-2.27), after adjusting for age, smoking, sociodemographic characteristics and chronic illnesses. The risk of mortality was also increased among drinkers who reported drinking > or = 3 drinks daily (1.69; 1.28-2.22) or prior alcohol treatment (1.66; 1.27-2.17), in "fully adjusted" models. A positive CAGE score (> or = 2) was associated with significantly increased risk of mortality among drinkers in a model adjusted only for age and smoking (1.27; 1.02-1.58). Among nondrinkers, neither a positive CAGE score (> or = 2) nor report of prior alcohol treatment was associated with increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: VA outpatients who reported drinking during the previous year and who had a positive result on an alcohol screening test experienced higher mortality over the subsequent 5 years than did patients who screened negative.
Authors: Ryan B Chew; Chris L Bryson; David H Au; Matthew L Maciejewski; Katharine A Bradley Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Alex H S Harris; Katharine A Bradley; Thomas Bowe; Patricia Henderson; Rudolf Moos Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Lauren Matukaitis Broyles; Adam J Gordon; Susan M Sereika; Christopher M Ryan; Judith A Erlen Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Elizabeth M Yano; Edmund F Chaney; Duncan G Campbell; Ruth Klap; Barbara F Simon; Laura M Bonner; Andrew B Lanto; Lisa V Rubenstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Katharine A Bradley; Amee J Epler; Kristen R Bush; Jennifer L Sporleder; Christopher W Dunn; Nancy E Cochran; Clarence H Braddock; Mary B McDonell; Stephan D Fihn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brendan J Clark; André Williams; Laura M Cecere Feemster; Katharine A Bradley; Madison Macht; Marc Moss; Ellen L Burnham Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Chuan-Fen Liu; Cory Bolkan; Domin Chan; Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa V Rubenstein; Edmund F Chaney Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-12-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Duncan G Campbell; Bradford L Felker; Chuan-Fen Liu; Elizabeth M Yano; JoAnn E Kirchner; Domin Chan; Lisa V Rubenstein; Edmund F Chaney Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 5.128