Literature DB >> 11838919

A longitudinal model of intake symptomatology, AA participation and outcome: retrospective study of the project MATCH outpatient and aftercare samples.

G J Connors1, J S Tonigan, W R Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study used data gathered in Project MATCH to longitudinally assess intake symptomatology, Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) participation, and outcome. Three primary constructs were considered: intake symptomatology, engagement in prescribed AA-related activities and functioning after engagement in AA-related behaviors.
METHOD: The participants were 480 outpatient and 434 aftercare clients who participated in Project MATCH.
RESULTS: Similar findings were found for each sample. Intake symptomatology positively predicted AA participation during the first 6 months following treatment. Although network support for drinking was negatively related to AA participation, such support did not mediate the relationship between intake symptomatology and subsequent AA participation. AA participation, in turn. positively predicted frequency of abstinent days in Months 7-12 posttreatment. This latter relationship was mediated by perceived self-efficacy to avoid drinking (Month 6). AA participation was positively related to self-efficacy to avoid drinking, which, in turn, predicted more days abstinent. One difference between the outpatient and aftercare samples emerged, involving the latent construct intake symptomatology. Intake symptomatology among outpatients was not predictive of percentage of abstinent days (Months 7-12), whereas intake symptomatology was negatively predictive of percentage of abstinent days in the aftercare sample.
CONCLUSIONS: Intake symptomatology positively predicted participation in AA, which predicted subsequent abstinent days. The positive relationship between AA participation and self-efficacy to avoid drinking may explain in part why AA engagement predicts subsequent increases in abstinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11838919     DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol        ISSN: 0096-882X


  42 in total

1.  The structure of client language and drinking outcomes in project match.

Authors:  Tim Martin; Paulette J Christopher; Jon M Houck; Theresa B Moyers
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2011-09

Review 2.  Computer-based interventions for drug use disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brent A Moore; Tera Fazzino; Brian Garnet; Christopher J Cutter; Declan T Barry
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2010-12-24

Review 3.  Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders.

Authors:  Rudolf H Moos
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  One small step for manuals: Computer-assisted training in twelve-step facilitation.

Authors:  Diane E Sholomskas; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2006-11

5.  Predictors of engagement in the Alcoholics Anonymous group or to psychotherapy among Brazilian alcoholics : a six-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Mauro Barbosa Terra; Helena Maria Tannhauser Barros; Airton Tetelbom Stein; Ivan Figueira; Luciana Dias Athayde; Luiz Henrique Palermo; Letícia Piccoli Tergolina; Joana Stela Rovani; Dartiu Xavier da Silveira
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 5.270

6.  Does sponsorship improve outcomes above Alcoholics Anonymous attendance? A latent class growth curve analysis.

Authors:  Jane Witbrodt; Lee Kaskutas; Jason Bond; Kevin Delucchi
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Participation in treatment and Alcoholics Anonymous: a 16-year follow-up of initially untreated individuals.

Authors:  Rudolf H Moos; Bernice S Moos
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2006-06

Review 8.  Social network variables in alcoholics anonymous: a literature review.

Authors:  D R Groh; L A Jason; C B Keys
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-08-07

9.  Do changes in selfishness explain 12-step benefit? A prospective lagged analysis.

Authors:  J Scott Tonigan; Kristina Rynes; Radka Toscova; Kylee Hagler
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.716

10.  From in-session behaviors to drinking outcomes: a causal chain for motivational interviewing.

Authors:  Theresa B Moyers; Tim Martin; Jon M Houck; Paulette J Christopher; J Scott Tonigan
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.