BACKGROUND: We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and course and outcome of patients with psychosis. Two hypotheses were examined: a) patients with higher best-ever SES will have better course and outcome than those with lower best-ever SES, and b) patients with greater downward drift in SES will have poorer course and outcome than those with less downward drift. METHOD: Data were drawn from the baseline and 2-year follow-up assessments of the UK700 Case Management Trial of 708 patients with severe psychosis. The indicators of SES used were occupational status and educational achievement. Drift in SES was defined as change from best-ever occupation to occupation at baseline. RESULTS: For the baseline data highly significant differences were found between best-ever groups and negative symptoms (non-manual vs. unemployed--coef -10.5, p=0.000, 95% CIs 5.1-15.8), functioning (non-manual vs. unemployed--coef -0.6, p=0.000, 95% CIs 0.3 to -0.8) and unmet needs (manual vs. unemployed - coef 0.5, p=0.004, 95% CIs 0.2-0.9). No significant differences between best-ever groups were found for days in hospital, symptoms, perceived quality of life and dissatisfaction with services. Significant differences for clinical and social variables were found between drift and non-drift SES groups. There were no significant findings between educational groups and clinical and social variables. CONCLUSIONS: Best-ever occupation, but not educational qualifications, appeared to predict prognosis in patients with severe psychosis. Downward drift in occupational status did not result in poorer illness course and outcome.
BACKGROUND: We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and course and outcome of patients with psychosis. Two hypotheses were examined: a) patients with higher best-ever SES will have better course and outcome than those with lower best-ever SES, and b) patients with greater downward drift in SES will have poorer course and outcome than those with less downward drift. METHOD: Data were drawn from the baseline and 2-year follow-up assessments of the UK700 Case Management Trial of 708 patients with severe psychosis. The indicators of SES used were occupational status and educational achievement. Drift in SES was defined as change from best-ever occupation to occupation at baseline. RESULTS: For the baseline data highly significant differences were found between best-ever groups and negative symptoms (non-manual vs. unemployed--coef -10.5, p=0.000, 95% CIs 5.1-15.8), functioning (non-manual vs. unemployed--coef -0.6, p=0.000, 95% CIs 0.3 to -0.8) and unmet needs (manual vs. unemployed - coef 0.5, p=0.004, 95% CIs 0.2-0.9). No significant differences between best-ever groups were found for days in hospital, symptoms, perceived quality of life and dissatisfaction with services. Significant differences for clinical and social variables were found between drift and non-drift SES groups. There were no significant findings between educational groups and clinical and social variables. CONCLUSIONS: Best-ever occupation, but not educational qualifications, appeared to predict prognosis in patients with severe psychosis. Downward drift in occupational status did not result in poorer illness course and outcome.
Authors: Sergio Rueda; Lori Chambers; Mike Wilson; Cameron Mustard; Sean B Rourke; Ahmed Bayoumi; Janet Raboud; John Lavis Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Richard Herrell; Ioline D Henter; Ramin Mojtabai; John J Bartko; Diane Venable; Ezra Susser; Kathleen R Merikangas; Richard J Wyatt Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2006-07-31 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Frederic C Blow; John E Zeber; John F McCarthy; Marcia Valenstein; Leah Gillon; C Raymond Bingham Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Victor Peralta; Elena García de Jalón; Lucía Moreno-Izco; David Peralta; Lucía Janda; Ana M Sánchez-Torres; Manuel J Cuesta Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2022-05-07 Impact factor: 7.348
Authors: Christy L M Hui; Cindy P Y Chiu; Yuet-Keung Li; Chi-Wing Law; Wing-Chung Chang; Sherry K W Chan; Edwin H M Lee; Pak Sham; Eric Y H Chen Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Rachel Jenkins; Frank Njenga; Marx Okonji; Pius Kigamwa; Makheti Baraza; James Ayuyo; Nicola Singleton; Sally McManus; David Kiima Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 3.390