Literature DB >> 11838533

Genetic influence on the variance in P3 amplitude and latency.

M J Wright1, N K Hansell, G M Geffen, L B Geffen, G A Smith, N G Martin.   

Abstract

The P3(00) event-related potential (ERP) component is widely used as a measure of cognitive functioning and provides a sensitive electrophysiological index of the attentional and working memory demands of a task. This study investigated what proportion of the variance in the amplitude and latency of the P3, elicited in a delayed response working memory task, could be attributed to genetic factors. In 335 adolescent twin pairs and 48 siblings, the amplitude and latency of the P3 were examined at frontal, central, and parietal sites. Additive genetic factors accounted for 48% to 61% of the variance in P3 amplitude. Approximately one-third of the genetic variation at frontal sites was mediated by a common genetic factor that also influenced the genetic variation at parietal and central sites. Familial resemblance in P3 latency was due to genetic influence that accounted for 44% to 50% of the variance. Genetic covariance in P3 latency across sites was substantial, with a large part of the variance found at parietal, central, and frontal sites attributed to a common genetic factor. The findings provide further evidence that the P3 is a promising phenotype of neural activity of the brain and has the potential to be used in linkage and association analysis in the search for quantitative trait loci (QTLs) influencing cognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11838533     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013393327704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  10 in total

1.  Speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses reflect familial and cognitive influences.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Deborah Lin; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-01

2.  A longitudinal twin study of effects of adolescent alcohol abuse on the neurophysiology of attention and orienting.

Authors:  Sini M Koskinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; Teija Kujala; Jaakko Kaprio; Brian F O'Donnell; Daria Osipova; Richard J Viken; Risto Näätänen; Richard J Rose
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Neurophysiological endophenotypes of schizophrenia: the viability of selected candidate measures.

Authors:  Bruce I Turetsky; Monica E Calkins; Gregory A Light; Ann Olincy; Allen D Radant; Neal R Swerdlow
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Neurophysiological endophenotypes across bipolar and schizophrenia psychosis.

Authors:  Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  Biomarkers of bipolar disorder: specific or shared with schizophrenia?

Authors:  Frank Bellivier; Pierre Alexis Geoffroy; Jan Scott; Franck Schurhoff; Marion Leboyer; Bruno Etain
Journal:  Front Biosci (Elite Ed)       Date:  2013-06-01

6.  From genotype to EEG endophenotype: a route for post-genomic understanding of complex psychiatric disease?

Authors:  Eco Jc de Geus
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.117

7.  Political attitudes develop independently of personality traits.

Authors:  Peter K Hatemi; Brad Verhulst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Validation and psychometric properties of the Somatic and Psychological HEalth REport (SPHERE) in a young Australian-based population sample using non-parametric item response theory.

Authors:  Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Tracey A Davenport; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Ian B Hickie
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Nineteen and Up study (19Up): understanding pathways to mental health disorders in young Australian twins.

Authors:  Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Victoria O'Callaghan; Nicholas G Martin; Ian B Hickie; Nathan A Gillespie; Richard Parker; Natalie Mills; Katherine M Kirk; Jan Scott; Anna Vinkhuyzen; Daniel F Hermens; Penelope A Lind; Tracey A Davenport; Jane M Burns; Melissa Connell; Brendan P Zietsch; James Scott; Margaret J Wright; Sarah E Medland; John McGrath
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The efficacy of formal auditory training in children with (central) auditory processing disorder: behavioral and electrophysiological evaluation.

Authors:  Renata Alonso; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.