Literature DB >> 11838278

Translocation and translaminar bioavailability of two neonicotinoid insecticides after foliar application to cabbage and cotton.

Anke Buchholz1, Ralf Nauen.   

Abstract

A laboratory study was undertaken to investigate the leaf systemic properties and the translaminar aphicidal activity of two commercialised neonicotinoid (chloronicotinyl) insecticides. For that purpose [14C]imidacloprid was subjected to uptake and translocation studies in cabbage and cotton after foliar application. Foliar penetration and short-term translocation patterns of imidacloprid were similar in both plant species. Nevertheless imidacloprid penetrated twice as much into cabbage leaves as it did into cotton leaves. It showed a comparable translaminar behaviour and was entirely translocated acropetally, indicating its well-known xylem mobility. The translaminar and acropetal movement of imidacloprid and acetamiprid were quantified by simple laboratory bioassays using the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer), and the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii (Glover), as typical homopteran pests for cabbage and cotton, respectively. A single dose (7.5 micrograms AI per leaf) applied to the upper leaf surface of cabbage and cotton was tested against aphids feeding on the lower leaf surface both close to and distant from the site of application 1, 5 and 12 days after treatment. The translaminar residual activity of imidacloprid on cabbage leaves was superior to that of acetamiprid, whereas its translaminar efficacy against A gossypii on cotton was inferior to that of acetamiprid. However, oral ingestion bioassays using an artificial double membrane feeding system revealed no significant differences in intrinsic activity between the two neonicotinoids tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11838278     DOI: 10.1002/ps.401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  7 in total

1.  Risk assessment of mixture formulation of spirotetramat and imidacloprid in chilli fruits.

Authors:  G S Chahil; Kousik Mandal; S K Sahoo; Balwinder Singh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Residue evaluation of imidacloprid, spirotetramat, and spirotetramat-enol in/on grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and soil.

Authors:  Soudamini Mohapatra; Sampath Kumar; G S Prakash
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil.

Authors:  J-M Bonmatin; C Giorio; V Girolami; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C Krupke; M Liess; E Long; M Marzaro; E A D Mitchell; D A Noome; N Simon-Delso; A Tapparo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Nitenpyram seed treatment effectively controls against the mirid bug Apolygus lucorum in cotton seedlings.

Authors:  Zhengqun Zhang; Yao Wang; Yunhe Zhao; Beixing Li; Jin Lin; Xuefeng Zhang; Feng Liu; Wei Mu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Larval exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid impacts adult size in the farmland butterfly Pieris brassicae.

Authors:  Penelope R Whitehorn; George Norville; Andre Gilburn; Dave Goulson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Assessing insecticide hazard to bumble bees foraging on flowering weeds in treated lawns.

Authors:  Jonathan L Larson; Carl T Redmond; Daniel A Potter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Slowing the Spread of Grapevine Leafroll-Associated Viruses in Commercial Vineyards With Insecticide Control of the Vector, Pseudococcus maritimus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae).

Authors:  A K Wallingford; M F Fuchs; T Martinson; S Hesler; G M Loeb
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 1.857

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.