Literature DB >> 11837904

An estimate of the economic effects of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation on Queensland dairy farms.

N N Jonsson1, R Davis, M De Witt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the cost to the Queensland dairy industry of cattle tick infestation and its control, excluding the costs incurred from control measures directed specifically at tick fever and morbidity and mortality arising from tick fever. STUDY
DESIGN: Economic models are described that have been based on empirical data relating to liveweight and milk yield loss, and on a survey of control practices and tick infestation. The first two models were designed to estimate costs of control and losses resulting from tick infestation on a single dairy farm. The third model developed estimates of the cost of tick infestation for each of four regions within the tick-infested area of Queensland.
RESULTS: The overall cost to the Queensland dairy industry of the cattle tick (excluding the costs associated specifically with tick fever) and based on 1998 management practices, was $4,096,000 per annum. About 49% of this cost was related to the costs of control and 51% to losses in production.
CONCLUSION: Cattle tick infestation represents a significant impost on dairy producers in Queensland, and although the actual cost will change as deregulation results in economic changes in the industry, infestations of ticks will continue to be expensive to control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11837904      PMCID: PMC7159636          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10929.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Vet J        ISSN: 0005-0423            Impact factor:   1.281


  6 in total

1.  Attitudes and practices of Queensland dairy farmers to the control of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus.

Authors:  N N Jonsson; A L Matschoss
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 2.  Costs of major parasites to the Australian livestock industries.

Authors:  R S McLeod
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.981

3.  Economic analysis of alternative AD control programmes.

Authors:  J McInerney; D Kooij
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Epizootiological factors in the control of bovine babesiosis.

Authors:  D F Mahoney; D R Ross
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  Production effects of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation of high yielding dairy cows.

Authors:  N N Jonsson; D G Mayer; A L Matschoss; P E Green; J Ansell
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  1998-07-17       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  The economics of cattle tick control in dry tropical Australia.

Authors:  N C Sing; L A Johnston; G Leatch
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.281

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Ticks from diverse genera encode chemokine-inhibitory evasin proteins.

Authors:  Jenni Hayward; Julie Sanchez; Andrew Perry; Cheng Huang; Manuel Rodriguez Valle; Meritxell Canals; Richard J Payne; Martin J Stone
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Cattle herd shearing can help to control Rhipicephalus microplus ticks.

Authors:  Cecília José Veríssimo; Rodrigo Giglioti; Selma Marques D'Agostino; Luciandra Macedo de Toledo; Luciana Morita Katiki; Keila Maria Roncato Duarte; Isabel Kinney Ferreira de Miranda Santos
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  The effects of flumethrin (Bayticol® pour-on) on European ticks exposed to treated hairs of cattle and sheep.

Authors:  Heinz Mehlhorn; Bärbel Schumacher; Antje Jatzlau; Fathy Abdel-Ghaffar; Khaled A S Al-Rasheid; Chandra Bhushan
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Immune recognition of salivary proteins from the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus differs according to the genotype of the bovine host.

Authors:  Gustavo Rocha Garcia; Sandra Regina Maruyama; Kristina T Nelson; José Marcos Chaves Ribeiro; Luiz Gustavo Gardinassi; Antonio Augusto Mendes Maia; Beatriz Rossetti Ferreira; Frans N J Kooyman; Isabel K F de Miranda Santos
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 5.  Projected economic losses due to vector and vector-borne parasitic diseases in livestock of India and its significance in implementing the concept of integrated practices for vector management.

Authors:  B W Narladkar
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2018-02-09

6.  Effects of Drought and Media-Reported Violence on Cattle Fever Tick Incursions.

Authors:  Jada M Thompson; Amy H Delgado; Hallie S Hasel; Denise L Bonilla
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-07-03

7.  Tick burden in Bos taurus cattle and its relationship with heat stress in three agroecological zones in the tropics of Colombia.

Authors:  Juan Felipe Rocha; Rodrigo Martínez; Nicolas López-Villalobos; Steve Todd Morris
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Length and density of filiform tongue papillae: differences between tick-susceptible and resistant cattle may affect tick loads.

Authors:  Cecília José Veríssimo; Selma Marques D'Agostino; Fernanda Ferreira Pessoa; Luciandra Macedo de Toledo; Isabel Kinney Ferreira de Miranda Santos
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 9.  Arbovirosis and potential transmission blocking vaccines.

Authors:  Berlin Londono-Renteria; Andrea Troupin; Tonya M Colpitts
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  The Babesia bovis hap2 gene is not required for blood stage replication, but expressed upon in vitro sexual stage induction.

Authors:  Hala E Hussein; Reginaldo G Bastos; David A Schneider; Wendell C Johnson; Fatma K Adham; William C Davis; Jacob M Laughery; David R Herndon; Heba F Alzan; Massaro W Ueti; Carlos E Suarez
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-10-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.