PURPOSE: To develop a predictive population pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for repaglinide (REP), an oral hypoglycemic agent, using artificial neural networks (ANNs). METHODS:REP, glucose concentrations, and demographic data from a dose ranging Phase 2 trial were divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). NeuroShell Predictor was used to create predictive PK and PK/PD models using population covariates: evaluate the relative significance of different covariates; and simulate the effect of covariates on the PK/PD of REP. Predictive performance was evaluated by calculating root mean square error and mean error for the training and test sets. These values were compared to naive averaging (NA) and randomly generated numbers (RN). RESULTS: Covariates found to have an influence on PK of REP include dose, gender. race, age, and weight. Covariates affecting the glucose response included dose, gender, and weight. These differences are not expected to be clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We came to the following three conclusions: 1) ANNs are more precise than NA and RN for both PK and PD; 2) the bias was acceptable for ANNs as compared with NA and RN; and 3) neural networks offer a quick and simple method for predicting, for identifying significant covariates, and for generating hypotheses.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To develop a predictive population pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for repaglinide (REP), an oral hypoglycemic agent, using artificial neural networks (ANNs). METHODS:REP, glucose concentrations, and demographic data from a dose ranging Phase 2 trial were divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). NeuroShell Predictor was used to create predictive PK and PK/PD models using population covariates: evaluate the relative significance of different covariates; and simulate the effect of covariates on the PK/PD of REP. Predictive performance was evaluated by calculating root mean square error and mean error for the training and test sets. These values were compared to naive averaging (NA) and randomly generated numbers (RN). RESULTS: Covariates found to have an influence on PK of REP include dose, gender. race, age, and weight. Covariates affecting the glucose response included dose, gender, and weight. These differences are not expected to be clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We came to the following three conclusions: 1) ANNs are more precise than NA and RN for both PK and PD; 2) the bias was acceptable for ANNs as compared with NA and RN; and 3) neural networks offer a quick and simple method for predicting, for identifying significant covariates, and for generating hypotheses.
Authors: S H Kang; M R Poynton; K M Kim; H Lee; D H Kim; S H Lee; K S Bae; O Linares; S E Kern; G J Noh Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2007-02-23 Impact factor: 4.335