Literature DB >> 11836239

Symmetry observations in long nucleotide sequences: a commentary on the Discovery Note of Qi and Cuticchia.

D R Forsdyke1.   

Abstract

The relative quantities of bases in DNA were determined chemically many years before sequencing technologies permitted direct counting of bases. Apparently unaware of the rich literature on the topic, bioinformaticists are today rediscovering the 'wheels' of Chargaff, Wyatt and other biochemists. It follows from Chargaff's second parity rule (%A = %T, %G = %C for single stranded DNA) that the symmetries observed for the two pairs of complementary mononucleotide bases, should also apply to the eight pairs of complementary dinucleotide bases, the thirty-two pairs of complementary trinucleotide bases, etc. This was made explicit by Prabhu in 1993 in a study of complete genomes and long genome segments from a wide range of taxa, and was rediscovered by Qi and Cuticchia in 2001 in a study of complete genomes. It follows from Chargaff's GC-rule (%GC tends to be uniform and species specific) that, within a species, oligonucleotides of the same GC% will be at approximately equal quantities in single stranded DNA. Thus, for example, while quantities of CAT and ATG (reverse complements) will be closely correlated because of both of the above Chargaff rules, CAT and GTA (forward complements) will show some correlation only because of the latter rule. The need for complete genomic sequences in bioinformatic analyses may have been somewhat overplayed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11836239     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  5 in total

1.  Optimum growth temperature and the base composition of open reading frames in prokaryotes.

Authors:  R J Lambros; J R Mortimer; D R Forsdyke
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Neutralism versus selectionism: Chargaff's second parity rule, revisited.

Authors:  Donald R Forsdyke
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 1.633

3.  Inverse symmetry in complete genomes and whole-genome inverse duplication.

Authors:  Sing-Guan Kong; Wen-Lang Fan; Hong-Da Chen; Zi-Ting Hsu; Nengji Zhou; Bo Zheng; Hoong-Chien Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A draft of the genome and four transcriptomes of a medicinal and pesticidal angiosperm Azadirachta indica.

Authors:  Neeraja M Krishnan; Swetansu Pattnaik; Prachi Jain; Prakhar Gaur; Rakshit Choudhary; Srividya Vaidyanathan; Sa Deepak; Arun K Hariharan; Pg Bharath Krishna; Jayalakshmi Nair; Linu Varghese; Naveen K Valivarthi; Kunal Dhas; Krishna Ramaswamy; Binay Panda
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Comparative genomic study reveals a transition from TA richness in invertebrates to GC richness in vertebrates at CpG flanking sites: an indication for context-dependent mutagenicity of methylated CpG sites.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Frederick C C Leung
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.691

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.