Literature DB >> 11836207

A Bayesian framework for combining gene predictions.

Vladimir Pavlović1, Ashutosh Garg, Simon Kasif.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Gene identification and gene discovery in new genomic sequences is one of the most timely computational questions addressed by bioinformatics scientists. This computational research has resulted in several systems that have been used successfully in many whole-genome analysis projects. As the number of such systems grows the need for a rigorous way to combine the predictions becomes more essential.
RESULTS: In this paper we provide a Bayesian network framework for combining gene predictions from multiple systems. The framework allows us to treat the problem as combining the advice of multiple experts. Previous work in the area used relatively simple ideas such as majority voting. We introduce, for the first time, the use of hidden input/output Markov models for combining gene predictions. We apply the framework to the analysis of the Adh region in Drosophila that has been carefully studied in the context of gene finding and used as a basis for the GASP competition. The main challenge in combination of gene prediction programs is the fact that the systems are relying on similar features such as cod on usage and as a result the predictions are often correlated. We show that our approach is promising to improve the prediction accuracy and provides a systematic and flexible framework for incorporating multiple sources of evidence into gene prediction systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11836207     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  18 in total

1.  A comparative genomic method for computational identification of prokaryotic translation initiation sites.

Authors:  Megon Walker; Vladimir Pavlovic; Simon Kasif
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Computational gene prediction using multiple sources of evidence.

Authors:  Jonathan E Allen; Mihaela Pertea; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Catherine Mathé; Marie-France Sagot; Thomas Schiex; Pierre Rouzé
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  EGPred: prediction of eukaryotic genes using ab initio methods after combining with sequence similarity approaches.

Authors:  Biju Issac; Gajendra Pal Singh Raghava
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Whole-genome annotation by using evidence integration in functional-linkage networks.

Authors:  Ulas Karaoz; T M Murali; Stan Letovsky; Yu Zheng; Chunming Ding; Charles R Cantor; Simon Kasif
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Gene and alternative splicing annotation with AIR.

Authors:  Liliana Florea; Valentina Di Francesco; Jason Miller; Russell Turner; Alison Yao; Michael Harris; Brian Walenz; Clark Mobarry; Gennady V Merkulov; Rosane Charlab; Ian Dew; Zuoming Deng; Sorin Istrail; Peter Li; Granger Sutton
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A method for construction, cloning and expression of intron-less gene from unannotated genomic DNA.

Authors:  Vineet Agrawal; Bharti Gupta; Uttam Chand Banerjee; Nilanjan Roy
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 2.695

8.  Genomix: a method for combining gene-finders' predictions, which uses evolutionary conservation of sequence and intron-exon structure.

Authors:  Avril Coghlan; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Human-mouse gene identification by comparative evidence integration and evolutionary analysis.

Authors:  Lingang Zhang; Vladimir Pavlovic; Charles R Cantor; Simon Kasif
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-05-12       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Machine learning integration for predicting the effect of single amino acid substitutions on protein stability.

Authors:  Ayşegül Ozen; Mehmet Gönen; Ethem Alpaydan; Türkan Haliloğlu
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.