Literature DB >> 11836135

Estimating the effective degrees of freedom in univariate multiple regression analysis.

F Kruggel1, M Pélégrini-Issac, H Benali.   

Abstract

The general linear model provides the most widely applied statistical framework for analyzing functional MRI (fMRI) data. With the increasing temporal resolution of recent scanning protocols, and more elaborate data preprocessing schemes, data independency is no longer a valid assumption. In this paper, we revise the statistical background of the general linear model in the presence of temporal autocorrelations. First, when detecting the activation signal, we explicitly account for the temporal autocorrelation structure, which yields a generalized F-test and the associated corrected (or effective) degrees of freedom (DOF). The proposed approach is data driven and thus independent of any specific preprocessing method. Then, for event-related protocols, we propose a new model for the temporal autocorrelations ("damped oscillator" model) and compare this model to another, previously used in the field (first-order autoregressive model, or AR(1) model). In the case of long fMRI time series, an efficient approximation for the number of effective DOF is provided for both models. Finally, the validity of our approach is assessed using simulated and real fMRI data and is compared with more conventional methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11836135     DOI: 10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00052-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  13 in total

1.  Independent component analysis (ICA) of generalized spike wave discharges in fMRI: comparison with general linear model-based EEG-fMRI.

Authors:  Friederike Moeller; Pierre LeVan; Jean Gotman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Independent component analysis as a model-free approach for the detection of BOLD changes related to epileptic spikes: a simulation study.

Authors:  Pierre LeVan; Jean Gotman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Modulation by EEG features of BOLD responses to interictal epileptiform discharges.

Authors:  Pierre LeVan; Louise Tyvaert; Jean Gotman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Sliding-window sensitivity encoding (SENSE) calibration for reducing noise in functional MRI (fMRI).

Authors:  Christine S Law; Chunlei Liu; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Interleaved spiral-in/out with application to functional MRI (fMRI).

Authors:  Christine S Law; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Independent component analysis reveals dynamic ictal BOLD responses in EEG-fMRI data from focal epilepsy patients.

Authors:  Pierre LeVan; Louise Tyvaert; Friederike Moeller; Jean Gotman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  On the acquisition of the water signal during water suppression: High-speed MR spectroscopic imaging with water referencing and concurrent functional MRI.

Authors:  Stefan Posse; Bruno Sa De La Rocque Guimaraes; Troy Hutchins-Delgado; Kishore Vakamudi; Kevin Fotso Tagne; Steen Moeller; Stephen R Dager
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  On the detection of high frequency correlations in resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Cameron Trapp; Kishore Vakamudi; Stefan Posse
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Impact of autocorrelation on functional connectivity.

Authors:  Mohammad R Arbabshirani; Eswar Damaraju; Ronald Phlypo; Sergey Plis; Elena Allen; Sai Ma; Daniel Mathalon; Adrian Preda; Jatin G Vaidya; Tülay Adali; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Empirical comparison of sources of variation for FMRI connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; John C Gore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.