Literature DB >> 11835924

Comparison of thromboembolic events in patients treated with celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitor, versus ibuprofen or diclofenac.

William B White1, Gerald Faich, Andrew Whelton, Clement Maurath, Nancy J Ridge, Kenneth M Verburg, G Steven Geis, James B Lefkowith.   

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that cyclooxygenase 2 specific inhibitors may increase the risk of cardiovascular (CV) thromboembolic events because of their inhibition of vascular prostacyclin synthesis and lack of an effect on platelet thromboxane A(2) production and aggregation. Thus, we analyzed the data for celecoxib and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) from the Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study to determine the incidences of serious CV thromboembolic events. This trial included 3,987 persons randomized to celecoxib 400 mg twice daily (2,320 person-years of exposure) and 3,981 persons randomized to either ibuprofen 800 mg 3 times daily or diclofenac 75 mg twice daily (2,203 person-years). Because acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) use for CV risk prophylaxis (< or =325 mg/day) was permitted, separate analyses were performed for all patients and those not taking ASA. The incidences of serious CV thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, stroke, CV deaths, and peripheral events) were similar, and not significantly different, between celecoxib and NSAID comparators (combined or individually) for all patients as well as the subgroup of patients not taking ASA. This observation was true both for all serious CV thromboembolic events, as well as for individual events. No increase in myocardial infarction was apparent, even in patients not taking ASA who were candidates for secondary prophylaxis for myocardial infarction. The relative risks for celecoxib versus NSAIDs for serious CV thromboembolic events were 1.1 for all patients and 1.1 for the subgroup of patients not taking ASA (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 1.6 and 0.6 to 1.9, respectively). In addition, the incidences of adverse CV events such as hypertension, edema, and congestive heart failure were similar to, or significantly lower than, NSAID comparators regardless of the use of ASA. Thus, these analyses demonstrate no increased risk of serious CV thromboembolic events associated with celecoxib compared with conventional NSAIDs and therefore do not support the hypothesis of a class adverse effect of cyclooxygenase 2 specific inhibitors on the CV system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11835924     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02265-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  44 in total

1.  COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  John C Peterson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Celecoxib: a review of its use for symptomatic relief in the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Paul L McCormack
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  COX-2 inhibitors and type 4 error.

Authors:  Michal R Pijak; Frantisek Gazdik
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents increase the risk for acute myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Joseph S Alpert
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  A comparison of reported gastrointestinal and thromboembolic events between rofecoxib and celecoxib using observational data.

Authors:  Rachna Kasliwal; Deborah Layton; Scott Harris; Lynda Wilton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Cyclooxygenase-2 and cancer treatment: understanding the risk should be worth the reward.

Authors:  David G Menter; Richard L Schilsky; Raymond N DuBois
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Perception of risk: the state of COX-2 selective inhibitors.

Authors:  Lee S Simon; Vibeke Strand
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  4 years after withdrawal of rofecoxib: where do we stand today?

Authors:  W Jaksch; C Dejaco; M Schirmer
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  Celecoxib: a review of its use in the management of arthritis and acute pain.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in cell proliferation and cell death in human malignancies.

Authors:  Cyril Sobolewski; Claudia Cerella; Mario Dicato; Lina Ghibelli; Marc Diederich
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.