Literature DB >> 11835905

Angiotensin II and trials of cardiovascular outcomes.

Peter Sleight1.   

Abstract

Proven cardiovascular benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. The first study to show dramatic benefits from ACE inhibition was the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS-I), in which a 31% decrease in the rate of death was observed in patients with severe heart failure at the end of 1 year of enalapril treatment (p = 0.001). This result led to large long-term studies-including Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE), Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE), Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE), and Study of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD)-which verified that ACE inhibition decreases heart failure, myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality, and that striking benefit could be observed within 30 days. Short-term studies of patients in the acute phase of a heart attack verified that ACE inhibition provided rapid benefits. A meta-analysis of short-term (up to 8 weeks) studies of ACE inhibition (including CONSENSUS-II, Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico [GISSI]-3, International Study of Infarct Survival [ISIS]-4, and the Chinese Captopril Study [CCS]-1) demonstrated that post-MI risk was reduced by 10% within the first day of treatment. The immediacy of the benefit suggested that ACE inhibition not only improved cardiovascular function in failing hearts but also affected important mechanisms in patients without overt heart failure. Effects on more general mechanisms of heart disease suggested that patients with problems other than hypertension or heart failure might benefit from ACE inhibitors. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study investigated the hypothesis that ACE inhibition would confer benefits to patients who were at high risk for cardiovascular events, but who were without left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure. Long-term reductions in MI, stroke, cardiac arrest, and heart failure, as well as improvements in mortality, were observed in this population after treatment with ACE inhibitors. Substudies of the HOPE study revealed that ACE inhibition reduced progression of atherosclerosis and improved myocardial remodeling. Taken together, these studies provide evidence that supports treatment of a broad population of patients at risk for cardiovascular events with ACE inhibitors. The next step is to combine ACE inhibition with other treatments to maximize patient benefit. The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) will compare the efficacy of an ACE inhibitor (ramipril) with an angiotensin receptor blocker (telmisartan), and determine whether these treatments in combination will further reduce morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11835905     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02322-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

1.  ACE inhibition prevents diastolic Ca2+ overload and loss of myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Zalvidea; L André; X Loyer; C Cassan; Y Sainte-Marie; J Thireau; I Sjaastad; C Heymes; J-L Pasquié; O Cazorla; F Aimond; S Richard
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.222

2.  Effects of combined inhibition of the Na+-H+ exchanger and angiotensin-converting enzyme in rats with congestive heart failure after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Hartmut Ruetten; Doris Gehring; Katrin Hiss; Ursula Schindler; Martin Gerl; Andreas E Busch; Stefan Schaefer
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors improve heart function and prevent fibrosis in cardiomyopathy caused by mutation in lamin A/C gene.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Antoine Muchir; Jian Shan; Gisèle Bonne; Howard J Worman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Genomics, heart failure and sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Dawood Darbar
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Effects of valsartan compared with enalapril on blood pressure and cognitive function in elderly patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  Roberto Fogari; Amedeo Mugellini; Annalisa Zoppi; Gianluigi Marasi; Carlo Pasotti; Luigi Poletti; Andrea Rinaldi; Paola Preti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Treatment of Resistant and Refractory Hypertension.

Authors:  Maria Czarina Acelajado; Zachary H Hughes; Suzanne Oparil; David A Calhoun
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Diuretics versus others for long-term clinical outcomes as first-line antihypertensive medications: analysis of national real-world database.

Authors:  Hack-Lyoung Kim; Doyeon Hwang; Jun Hyeok Lee; Hae-Young Lee; Sang-Hyun Ihm; Kwang Il Kim; Jinho Shin; Sungha Park; Dae-Hee Kim; Ki-Chul Sung
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Interactive Effects of Enalapril Administration and Novel HIIT Wheel-Bed Training in Aged Rats.

Authors:  Youfeng Yang; Anisha Banerjee; Yi Sun; Christy S Carter; Thomas W Buford
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-11-08

9.  Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy and comorbidity in diabetes: results from the Vermont diabetes information system.

Authors:  Maria E Ramos-Nino; Charles D Maclean; Benjamin Littenberg
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.763

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.