Literature DB >> 11835425

Selective suppression of sphincter activation during sacral anterior nerve root stimulation.

Narendra Bhadra1, Volker Grünewald, Graham Creasey, J Thomas Mortimer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to electrically activate small-diameter motor fibers in the sacral anterior roots innervating the urinary bladder, without activating the large-diameter fibers to the sphincter. Quasitrapezoidal current pulses were applied through tripolar spiral nerve electrodes on selected anterior sacral roots during acute experiments on eight dogs, maintained under pentobarbital anesthesia. Pressures were recorded from the bladder and sphincter with catheter-mounted gauges. Stimulation with biphasic quasitrapezoidal pulses showed decrease in sphincter recruitment with increasing pulse amplitudes. The minimum current amplitude that resulted in maximum sphincter suppression was used to stimulate the roots with trains of 20 Hz pulses, with 60 mL of saline filling the bladder. Pressures were also recorded when 100 micros rectangular pulse trains at 20 Hz, both continuous and intermittent, were applied. Trains of stimuli were applied before and after dorsal root rhizotomy. Suppression of sphincter activation was defined to be a percentage, [(Maximum pressure -Minimum pressure)/Maximum pressure x100. The results from 22 roots in eight animals show that with single pulses, the average percentage suppression of sphincter activation was 76.3% (+/-14.0). The minimum current for maximum sphincter suppression was 1.29 mA (+/-0.62). The average bladder pressure evoked was 50 cm of water during pulse train stimulation, with no significant difference due to pulse type. With pulse trains, the sphincter pressures were significantly higher when the bladder was filled. Evacuation of fluid occurred in three animals with average flow rates of 1.0 mL/s. Copyright 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11835425     DOI: 10.1002/nau.2068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  8 in total

1.  Different pulse shapes for selective large fibre block in sacral nerve roots using a technique of anodal block: an experimental study.

Authors:  A Vucković; N J M Rijkhoff
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  High frequency electrical conduction block of the pudendal nerve.

Authors:  Narendra Bhadra; Niloy Bhadra; Kevin Kilgore; Kenneth J Gustafson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Spinal reflex control of micturition after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Changfeng Tai; James R Roppolo; William C de Groat
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Continuous Direct Current Nerve Block Using Multi Contact High Capacitance Electrodes.

Authors:  Tina Vrabec; Niloy Bhadra; Gustaf Van Acker; Narendra Bhadra; Kevin Kilgore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Characterization of high capacitance electrodes for the application of direct current electrical nerve block.

Authors:  Tina Vrabec; Niloy Bhadra; Jesse Wainright; Narendra Bhadra; Manfred Franke; Kevin Kilgore
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  Neuroprostheses to treat neurogenic bladder dysfunction: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nico J M Rijkhoff
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Suppression of reflex urethral responses by sacral dermatome stimulation in an acute spinalized feline model.

Authors:  Timothy Y Mariano; Narendra Bhadra; Kenneth J Gustafson
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Verification and Defined Dosage of Sodium Pentobarbital for a Urodynamic Study in the Possibility of Survival Experiments in Female Rat.

Authors:  Sheng-Fei Xu; Guang-Hui Du; Kuerbanjiang Abulikim; Peng Cao; Hui-Bing Tan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.