Literature DB >> 11834753

On the theory of individual health.

G Danzer1, M Rose, M Walter, B F Klapp.   

Abstract

On top of elaborate methods and approaches in research, diagnostics, and therapy, medicine is in need of a theory of its own thought and action; without theoretical reflection and referentiality, action becomes blind (and thus costly) and thought takes on a monotonous and circular character. Take the concept of health. The field of medicine, more and more taking its cues from evidence-based medicine (EBM), is onesidedly oriented to concepts of health which are based on notions of standard values for large populations or-in the shadow of the genome project-see health as the outcome of an intact genome, often turning a blind eye to the individual aspects of health. With an eye in particular to Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy, the present paper looks into some continental European theories of individual health, seeking to determine to what extent they can contribute to reducing medicine's theory deficit and what consequences this may have for research, diagnostics, and therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11834753      PMCID: PMC1733505          DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

Review 1.  Disease, illness, sickness, health, healing and wholeness: exploring some elusive concepts.

Authors:  Kenneth M Boyd
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2000-06

2.  Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes.

Authors:  I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Psychological response to breast cancer: effect on outcome.

Authors:  S Greer; T Morris; K W Pettingale
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Willingness to donate: an interview study before liver transplantation.

Authors:  M Walter; C Papachristou; G Danzer; B F Klapp; J Frommer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  The unwitting sacrifice problem.

Authors:  G Gillett
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Balancing health care evidence and art to meet clinical needs: policymakers' perspectives.

Authors:  Louise E Parker; Mona J Ritchie; Joann E Kirchner; Richard R Owen
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.431

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.