STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the change in bladder pressure (Pblad) and central venous pressure (Pcvp) may reflect the changes in esophageal pressure (Pes) and gastric pressure (Pgas) when inspiratory pressure support (IPS) is altered. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: The ICUs of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Ten patients currently receiving IPS ventilation via a tracheostomy or an endotracheal tube who already had bladder and central venous catheters in situ. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Airway pressure, Pes, Pgas, Pcvp, Pblad, and flow were measured at the original IPS setting. IPS then was reduced by 5-cm H(2)O increments until IPS was zero or was at the minimum pressure that could be tolerated by each patient. At each level of IPS, pressures and flow were measured at steady-state breathing. The maximum pressure difference for each pressure during inspiration was calculated. We found that the Delta Pblad correlated closely with the Delta Pgas (r = 0.904) and that the Delta Pes correlated with the Delta Pcvp (r = 0.951). When the Delta Pcvp - Delta Pblad was compared with the transdiaphragmatic pressure for each patient as the IPS was altered, the correlation coefficients varied from 0.952 to 0.999. CONCLUSION: Although absolute values for the Delta Pcvp during mechanical ventilation do not always reflect the Delta Pes, useful information can be obtained from this route. In individual patients, the two sites of measurement followed each other when IPS was changed, enabling a bedside assessment of the response to reducing respiratory support.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the change in bladder pressure (Pblad) and central venous pressure (Pcvp) may reflect the changes in esophageal pressure (Pes) and gastric pressure (Pgas) when inspiratory pressure support (IPS) is altered. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: The ICUs of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Ten patients currently receiving IPS ventilation via a tracheostomy or an endotracheal tube who already had bladder and central venous catheters in situ. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Airway pressure, Pes, Pgas, Pcvp, Pblad, and flow were measured at the original IPS setting. IPS then was reduced by 5-cm H(2)O increments until IPS was zero or was at the minimum pressure that could be tolerated by each patient. At each level of IPS, pressures and flow were measured at steady-state breathing. The maximum pressure difference for each pressure during inspiration was calculated. We found that the Delta Pblad correlated closely with the Delta Pgas (r = 0.904) and that the Delta Pes correlated with the Delta Pcvp (r = 0.951). When the Delta Pcvp - Delta Pblad was compared with the transdiaphragmatic pressure for each patient as the IPS was altered, the correlation coefficients varied from 0.952 to 0.999. CONCLUSION: Although absolute values for the Delta Pcvp during mechanical ventilation do not always reflect the Delta Pes, useful information can be obtained from this route. In individual patients, the two sites of measurement followed each other when IPS was changed, enabling a bedside assessment of the response to reducing respiratory support.
Authors: Daniel Talmor; Todd Sarge; Atul Malhotra; Carl R O'Donnell; Ray Ritz; Alan Lisbon; Victor Novack; Stephen H Loring Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ulrich Mayr; Eugen Karsten; Tobias Lahmer; Sebastian Rasch; Philipp Thies; Benedikt Henschel; Gerrit Fischer; Roland M Schmid; Wolfgang Huber Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 3.240