Literature DB >> 11834309

Foreperiod duration and motor preparation during childhood.

Isabelle Olivier1, Christina Rival.   

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the development of motor preparation across three groups of children aged 6, 8 and 10 years old. The foreperiod duration (500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 ms) and the motor preparation conditions were manipulated using a priming procedure. Two type of primes were provided: (1), a prime carrying no advanced information (neutral condition); and (2), a prime giving advanced information on the nature of the motor response to execute, allowing the participant to prepare for it (selective condition). Reaction time and response errors were analyzed. Results showed that under both conditions, the optimal motor preparation was reached within the same time frame which decreased as age increased. As to the optimal alertness level (neutral preparation), it is maintained longer as age increases, whereas the optimal motor programming level (selective preparation) is reached only for specific foreperiod duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11834309     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02510-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  5 in total

1.  The effect of feedback schedule manipulation on speech priming patterns and reaction time.

Authors:  Dana Slocomb; Kristie A Spencer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-09-12

2.  Effects of response preparation on developmental improvements in inhibitory control.

Authors:  Sarah Ordaz; Stephanie Davis; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-03-26

3.  The increased foreperiod duration to attain the neutral optimal preparation from sitting to standing.

Authors:  Rémy Cuisinier; Isabelle Olivier; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Developmental Trajectories of Internally and Externally Driven Temporal Prediction.

Authors:  Giovanni Mento; Vincenza Tarantino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reaction to a Visual Stimulus: Anticipation with Steady and Dynamic Contractions.

Authors:  Agostina Casamento-Moran; Stefan Delmas; Seoung Hoon Park; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.