Literature DB >> 11833908

Development of a protocol for monitoring status and trends in forest soil carbon at a national level.

C J Palmer1, W D Smith, B L Conkling.   

Abstract

The national Forest Health Monitoring (FHM) program requires protocols for monitoring soil carbon contents. In a pilot study, 30 FHM plots loblolly shortleaf (Pinus taeda L./Pinus echinata Mill.) pine forests across Georgia were sampled by horizon and by depth increments. For total soil carbon, approximately 40% of the variance was between plots, 40% between subplots and 20% within subplots. Results by depth differed from those obtained by horizon primarily due to the rapid changes in carbon content from the top to the bottom of the A horizon. Published soil survey information overestimated bulk densities for these forest sites. The measurement of forest floor depths as a substitute to sampling did not provide reliable estimates of forest floor carbon. Precision of replicate samples was approximately 10-30% for field duplicates and 5-10% for laboratory duplicates. Based on national indicator evaluation criteria, sampling by depth using bulk density core samplers has been recommended for national implementation. Additional procedures are needed when sampling organic soils or soils with a high percentage of large rock fragments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11833908     DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00253-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  3 in total

1.  Developing a national indicator of soil quality on U.S forestlands: methods and initial results.

Authors:  Katherine P O'Neill; Michael C Amacher; Craig J Palmer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Spatial variation in soil carbon in the organic layer of managed boreal forest soil--implications for sampling design.

Authors:  Petteri Muukkonen; Margareeta Häkkinen; Raisa Mäkipää
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Sources of errors and uncertainties in the assessment of forest soil carbon stocks at different scales-review and recommendations.

Authors:  E I Vanguelova; E Bonifacio; B De Vos; M R Hoosbeek; T W Berger; L Vesterdal; K Armolaitis; L Celi; L Dinca; O J Kjønaas; P Pavlenda; J Pumpanen; Ü Püttsepp; B Reidy; P Simončič; B Tobin; M Zhiyanski
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.513

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.