Literature DB >> 11833695

Comparison of the effectiveness of bacterial culture, 16S rDNA directed polymerase chain reaction, and checkerboard DNA-dNA hybridization for detection of Fusobacterium nucleatum in endodontic infections.

Saulo Roni Moraes1, Jose Freitas Siqueira, Ana Paula Colombo, Isabela das Neves Rôças, Maria Candida de Souza Ferreira, Regina Maria Cavalcanti Pilotto Domingues.   

Abstract

Fusobacterium nucleatum is a Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, nonmotile, obligatory anaerobic rod that is normally isolated from the oral cavity. Epidemiological studies have shown that this species is one of the most prevalent in primary root canal infections. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of bacteriological culture, 16S rDNA directed polymerase chain reaction and checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization for detection of F. nucleatum strains in infected teeth associated with periradicular lesions. Thirteen single-root teeth from adult patients, all having carious lesions, necrotic pulps, and radiographic evidence of periradicular bone loss were included in this study. Combining all methods, the results indicated that F. nucleatum was present in approximately 31% (4 of 13) of the specimens. Incidence of F. nucleatum in root canal infections, as evaluated in this study by polymerase chain reaction, culture, and DNA-DNA hybridization, was 15.4%, 15.4%, and 10.0%, respectively. Our data demonstrated that no method used herein could be considered superior for detecting F. nucleatum directly from clinical samples. However, the small number of samples examined and the low prevalence that was observed should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11833695     DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200202000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  6 in total

1.  Identification of Fusobacterium nucleatum in primary and secondary endodontic infections and its association with clinical features by using two different methods.

Authors:  Brenda P F A Gomes; Juliana D Bronzato; Rebecca F Almeida-Gomes; Ericka T Pinheiro; Ezilmara L R Sousa; Rogério C Jacinto
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative evaluation of apical bacterial extrusion following root canal instrumentation using different endodontic file systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Bhavana Vankayala; Kavitha Anantula; Harikrishna Saladi; Leneena Gudugunta; Jeevan Matada Basavarajaiah; Sarjeev Singh Yadav
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2020-08-20

3.  On the use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis approach for bacterial identification in endodontic infections.

Authors:  Julio C Machado de Oliveira; Tulio G V Gama; José F Siqueira; Isabela N Rôças; Raquel S Peixoto; Alexandre S Rosado
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Application of a chairside anaerobic culture test for endodontic treatment.

Authors:  Masahiro Yoneda; Seidai Kita; Nao Suzuki; Sonia M Macedo; Kosaku Iha; Takao Hirofuji
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-12-30

5.  Detection of periodontal markers in chronic periodontitis.

Authors:  Asa Leonhardt; Anette Carlén; Lisbeth Bengtsson; Gunnar Dahlén
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-07-07

6.  [Not Available].

Authors:  F Gu; Y Li; C Zhou; D T W Wong; C M Ho; F Qi; W Shi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2009-04-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.