J Jougon1, F Delcambre, T MacBride, A Minniti, J F Velly. 1. Service de chirurgie thoracique, hôpital de Haut-Lévèque, CHU de Bordeaux, 33604 Pessac, France. jacques.jougon@chu-bordeaux.fr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To underline the severity of instrumental esophageal perforations and to discuss their management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients treated for instrumental esophageal perforation were collected retrospectively from 1980 to 1995 then prospectively since 1995 to 2000. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were treated for instrumental perforations. Perforation occurred after exploratory endoscopy (n = 24), endoscopic dilation (n = 13), attempted tracheal intubation (n = 5), foreign body extraction (n = 5), treatment of esophageal varices (n = 4), trans-esophageal echocardiography (n = 2), and duodenal prosthesis implantation (n = 1). Clinical manifestations were immediate in 18 cases and delayed in all others, with an interval before treatment ranging from 2 hours to 45 days (mean = 70 hours). All patients were operated after large spectrum antibiotherapy and intensive care, except 3 who were treated medically due to their poor general condition. Fourteen (26%) patients died, including the 3 non-operated ones. CONCLUSION: Instrumental esophageal perforations are associated with a high mortality, probably due to the poor general condition of the patients. Diagnosis of these perforations is often delayed. A good experience of endoscopic maneuveurs and adequate post-endoscopic monitoring could allow earlier surgical treatment with lower mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To underline the severity of instrumental esophageal perforations and to discuss their management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients treated for instrumental esophageal perforation were collected retrospectively from 1980 to 1995 then prospectively since 1995 to 2000. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were treated for instrumental perforations. Perforation occurred after exploratory endoscopy (n = 24), endoscopic dilation (n = 13), attempted tracheal intubation (n = 5), foreign body extraction (n = 5), treatment of esophageal varices (n = 4), trans-esophageal echocardiography (n = 2), and duodenal prosthesis implantation (n = 1). Clinical manifestations were immediate in 18 cases and delayed in all others, with an interval before treatment ranging from 2 hours to 45 days (mean = 70 hours). All patients were operated after large spectrum antibiotherapy and intensive care, except 3 who were treated medically due to their poor general condition. Fourteen (26%) patients died, including the 3 non-operated ones. CONCLUSION: Instrumental esophageal perforations are associated with a high mortality, probably due to the poor general condition of the patients. Diagnosis of these perforations is often delayed. A good experience of endoscopic maneuveurs and adequate post-endoscopic monitoring could allow earlier surgical treatment with lower mortality.
Authors: Henrike Lenzen; Ahmed A Negm; Thomas J Erichsen; Michael P Manns; Jochen Wedemeyer; Tim O Lankisch Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2013-07-16
Authors: Petra G A van Boeckel; Kulwinder S Dua; Bas L A M Weusten; Ruben J H Schmits; Naveen Surapaneni; Robin Timmer; Frank P Vleggaar; Peter D Siersema Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Jae J Hwang; Yeon S Jeong; Young S Park; Hyuk Yoon; Cheol M Shin; Nayoung Kim; Dong H Lee Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki; Krzysztof Szmyt; Adam Bobkiewicz; Stanisław Malinger; Józef Świrkowicz; Jacek Hermann; Michał Drews; Tomasz Banasiewicz Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 1.195