Literature DB >> 11831530

The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows.

P H Hemsworth1, G J Coleman, J L Barnett, S Borg, S Dowling.   

Abstract

Two experiments, one involving 29 commercial farms and the other involving 94 commercial farms, were conducted to examine the effects of a training program targeting a number of attitudinal and behavioral variables in stockpeople. These stockperson variables had been previously shown to be related to fear of humans and productivity of commercial cows. In both experiments, two treatments were imposed: an Intervention treatment, consisting of a cognitive-behavioral intervention procedure designed to improve the attitude and behavior of stockpeople toward cows, and a Control treatment, in which no intervention was attempted. In Exp. 1, an analysis of covariance, using previous lactation variables as the covariate, revealed effects of the Intervention treatment on the attitude and behavior of the stockpeople and the behavior of cows. Stockpeople at Intervention farms showed more (P < 0.01) positive beliefs about handling cows and used a lower (P < 0.05) number and percentage of negative tactile interactions in handling cows than stockpeople at the Control farms. Cows at the Intervention farms showed a shorter (P < 0.05) flight distance to humans, indicating a lower level of fear of humans by these cows. However, 36% of the Intervention farms failed to show a reduction in average flight distance over the two lactations. Although there was no significant treatment effect on milk yield, the Intervention farms in which fear levels declined following the intervention had a higher (P < 0.05) milk yield than the other farms. In Exp. 2, a significant (P < 0.05) increase was found in the milk yield of cows following the Intervention treatment. Similar treatment effects were observed on both milk protein and milk fat. These results indicate that cognitive-behavioral interventions that successfully target the key attitudes and behavior of stockpeople that regulate the cow's fear of humans offer the industry good opportunities to improve the productivity of cows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11831530     DOI: 10.2527/2002.80168x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  18 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of quality of life and risk factors affecting quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jing Han; Qintong Xu; Yi Yang; Zhengjun Yao; Chi Zhang
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2015-02

2.  Intensity of oestrus signalling is the most relevant indicator for animal well-being in high-producing dairy cows.

Authors:  Emanuel Garcia; Jan Hultgren; Pontus Fällman; Johanna Geust; Bo Algers; George Stilwell; Stefan Gunnarsson; Heriberto Rodriguez-Martinez
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2011-08-22

3.  Matricaria chamomilla CH12 decreases handling stress in Nelore calves.

Authors:  Luis Souza Lima de Souza Reis; Paulo Eduardo Pardo; Eunice Oba; Sergio do Nascimento Kronka; Neuza Maria Frazatti-Gallina
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.672

4.  Characteristics of Loads of Cattle Stopping for Feed, Water and Rest during Long-Distance Transport in Canada.

Authors:  Hannah E Flint; Karen S Schwartzkopf-Genswein; Ken G Bateman; Derek B Haley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  The Relationship between Farmers' Perceptions and Animal Welfare Standards in Sheep Farms.

Authors:  I Kılıç; Z Bozkurt
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 6.  The Challenges of Using Horses for Practical Teaching Purposes in Veterinary Programmes.

Authors:  Gabriella Gronqvist; Chris Rogers; Erica Gee; Charlotte Bolwell; Stuart Gordon
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Pessimism and fearfulness in dairy calves.

Authors:  Benjamin Lecorps; Daniel M Weary; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Animal welfare in the U.S. slaughter industry-a focus on fed cattle.

Authors:  Lily N Edwards-Callaway; Michelle S Calvo-Lorenzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Positive attitudes, positive outcomes: The relationship between farmer attitudes, management behaviour and sheep welfare.

Authors:  Carolina A Munoz; Grahame J Coleman; Paul H Hemsworth; Angus J D Campbell; Rebecca E Doyle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The existence of parenting styles in the owner-dog relationship.

Authors:  Ineke R van Herwijnen; Joanne A M van der Borg; Marc Naguib; Bonne Beerda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.