Literature DB >> 11831309

Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.

L N Baratieri1, A V Ritter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the 4-year clinical performance of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a period of 1 year, 726 restorations (248 molars, 478 premolars; 260 Class I, 466 Class II; 540 replacements, 186 primary decay) were placed on conservative preparations, using the incremental placement technique in a clinical environment. Baseline data were collected, and the restorations were evaluated after 4 years. Z100 and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP) (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minnesota) were used as the restorative system. The criteria evaluated were color match, marginal adaptation, anatomic form, cavosurface marginal discoloration, axial contour, interproximal contact, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, and tooth vitality.
RESULTS: At baseline, 24% of the teeth restored presented postoperative sensitivity; 86% of the sensitive teeth were from the replacement group. At 4 years, all teeth were vital to cold test. Eighteen restorations (2.5%) presented clinically detectable marginal fracture. The shade was acceptable in all restorations. Cavosurface marginal discoloration was observed in 47 restorations (6.5% bravo scores). Axial contour, interproximal contact, and marginal adaptation received 100% alfa scores. No secondary caries was diagnosed in any of the teeth examined. None of the examined restorations required replacement. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Under controlled clinical conditions, posterior resin-based composite restorations placed with the total-etch technique and restorative Z100/SBMP have the potential to present a high success rate at 4 years. None of the examined restorations required replacement, and there was no clinically detectable wear in any of the restorations. Simultaneous etching of enamel and dentin followed by the application of a resin adhesive can be considered an adequate modality of pulp protection in nonexposed tooth preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11831309     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00251.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent        ISSN: 1496-4155            Impact factor:   2.843


  8 in total

1.  Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 8-year results.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Christian Reinelt; Norbert Krämer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Isabella Pereira Marques; Fabíola Belkiss Santos de Oliveira; João Gabriel Silva Souza; Raquel Conceição Ferreira; Claudia Silami Magalhães; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França; Daniela Araújo Veloso Popoff
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Clinical Efficacy of Two Different Desensitizers in Reducing Postoperative Sensitivity Following Composite Restorations.

Authors:  Rutuja Rajnekar; Nikhil Mankar; Pradnya Nikhade; Manoj Chandak; Anuja Ikhar; Karuna Burde
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Is it the end of the road for dental amalgam? A critical review.

Authors:  Arvind Shenoy
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-07

5.  Postoperative hypersensitivity and its relationship to preparation variables in Class I resin-based composite restorations: findings from the practitioners engaged in applied research and learning (PEARL) Network. Part 1.

Authors:  Gary Berkowitz; Howard Spielman; Abigail Matthews; Donald Vena; Ronald Craig; Frederick Curro; Van Thompson
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2013-03

6.  A comparative evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity and microleakage associated with composite restorations in cavities preconditioned with air abrasion - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ankit Arora; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Saraswathi M Vidya; Padmaja Sharma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

7.  Renewal MI Dental Composite Etch and Seal Properties.

Authors:  Nabih Alkhouri; Wendy Xia; Paul F Ashley; Anne M Young
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.748

8.  Effect of different adhesive strategies on the post-operative sensitivity of class I composite restorations.

Authors:  Hande Sar Sancakli; Esra Yildiz; Isil Bayrak; Sevda Ozel
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.