Literature DB >> 11831211

Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli.

Neil Stewart1, Gordon D A Brown, Nick Chater.   

Abstract

Categorization research typically assumes that the cognitive system has access to a (more or less noisy) representation of the absolute magnitudes of the properties of stimuli and that this information is used in reaching a categorization decision. However, research on identification of simple perceptual stimuli suggests that people have very poor representations of absolute magnitude information and that judgments about absolute magnitude are strongly influenced by preceding material. The experiments presented here investigate such sequence effects in categorization tasks. Strong sequence effects were found. Classification of a borderline stimulus was more accurate when preceded by a distant member of the opposite category than by a distant member of the same category. It is argued that this category contrast effect cannot be accounted for by extant exemplar or decision-bound models of categorization. The effect suggests the use of relative magnitude information in categorization. A memory and contrast model illustrates how relative magnitude information may be used in categorization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11831211     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  25 in total

1.  Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: sensory and decisional effects.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Mieke Vanbussel; Claudia S Schreiner; Daniel Mendelsohn; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Category learning in the context of co-presented items.

Authors:  Janet K Andrews; Kenneth R Livingston; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-11-14

3.  Classification response times in probabilistic rule-based category structures: contrasting exemplar-retrieval and decision-boundary models.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

4.  Modeling unidimensional categorization in monkeys.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Roger Ratcliff; Anil Cherian; Mark Segraves
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Category dimensionality and feature knowledge: when more features are learned as easily as fewer.

Authors:  Aaron B Hoffman; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Beyond common features: the role of roles in determining similarity.

Authors:  Matt Jones; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Relative judgment and knowledge of the category structure.

Authors:  Neil Stewart; William J Matthews
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

8.  Trial-to-trial, uncertainty-based adjustment of decision boundaries in visual categorization.

Authors:  Ahmad T Qamar; R James Cotton; Ryan G George; Jeffrey M Beck; Eugenia Prezhdo; Allison Laudano; Andreas S Tolias; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A rule-based presentation order facilitates category learning.

Authors:  Fabien Mathy; Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

10.  Limits in decision making arise from limits in memory retrieval.

Authors:  Gyslain Giguère; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.