Literature DB >> 11830473

Precise quantification of minimal residual disease at day 29 allows identification of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and an excellent outcome.

Charlotte Nyvold1, Hans O Madsen, Lars P Ryder, Jeanette Seyfarth, Arne Svejgaard, Niels Clausen, Finn Wesenberg, Olafur G Jonsson, Erik Forestier, Kjeld Schmiegelow.   

Abstract

The postinduction level of minimal residual disease (MRD) was quantified with a competitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique in 104 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) diagnosed between June 1993 and January 1998 and followed for a median of 4.2 years. A significant correlation was found between the MRD level on day 15 (D15) and day 29 (D29) after the start of induction therapy (r(s) = 0.70, P <.0001). The 15 patients with T-cell disease had higher D29 MRD than those with B-lineage ALL (P =.01). Age was positively related to D29 MRD (r(s) = 0.32, P =.001). The 16 patients who had a relapse had higher D15 and D29 MRD levels than the patients who stayed in remission (median levels D15, 1% versus 0.1%, P =.03; D29, 0.4% versus 0.01%, P =.0001). No patients with a MRD level less than 0.01% on D29 have so far had a relapse, whereas the 7-year probability of event-free survival for patients with higher MRD levels was 0.52 (P =.0007). The group of patients with a D29 MRD less than 0.01% included patients with T-cell disease, white blood cell count more than 50 x 10(9)/L at diagnosis, or age 10 years or older, and could not be identified by up-front criteria. The best-fit Cox model to predict the risk of relapse included D29 MRD (P =.004) and age (P =.009). These findings indicate that with the present treatment protocol MRD quantification at an early stage of therapy identifies patients with a very low risk of relapse. Further trials are needed to reveal whether such patients with D29 MRD less than 0.01% can be cured with less intensive chemotherapy, which would reduce the risk of serious late effects as well as the costs of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11830473     DOI: 10.1182/blood.v99.4.1253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  30 in total

Review 1.  The clinical relevance of detection of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  J Moppett; G A A Burke; C G Steward; A Oakhill; N J Goulden
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Quantitative analysis of minimal residual disease predicts relapse in children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia in DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 95-01.

Authors:  Jianbiao Zhou; Meredith A Goldwasser; Aihong Li; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Donna Neuberg; Hongjun Wang; Virginia Dalton; Kathryn D McBride; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman; John G Gribben
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  New markers for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Elaine Coustan-Smith; Guangchun Song; Christopher Clark; Laura Key; Peixin Liu; Mohammad Mehrpooya; Patricia Stow; Xiaoping Su; Sheila Shurtleff; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing; Dario Campana
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Low platelet counts after induction therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia are strongly associated with poor early response to treatment as measured by minimal residual disease and are prognostic for treatment outcome.

Authors:  Lutz Zeidler; Martin Zimmermann; Anja Möricke; Barbara Meissner; Dorothee Bartels; Christoph Tschan; André Schrauder; Gunnar Cario; Lilia Goudeva; Sarah Jäger; Richard Ratei; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Andrea Teigler-Schlegel; Julia Skokowa; Rolf Koehler; Claus R Bartram; Hansjörg Riehm; Martin Schrappe; Karl Welte; Martin Stanulla
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Michael J Borowitz; Meenakshi Devidas; Stephen P Hunger; W Paul Bowman; Andrew J Carroll; William L Carroll; Stephen Linda; Paul L Martin; D Jeanette Pullen; David Viswanatha; Cheryl L Willman; Naomi Winick; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  The myth of the second remission of acute leukemia in the adult.

Authors:  Stephen J Forman; Jacob M Rowe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Twenty years' experience in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Nagoya Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group.

Authors:  Hiroatsu Iida; Hiroshi Sao; Kenjiro Kitaori; Seiichi Gotoh; Makoto Yazaki; Seiji Kojima; Atsushi Wakita; Yasuo Morishima; Yoshihisa Kodera; Yoshihisa Morishita
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 8.  Back to the future! The evolving role of maintenance therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher S Hourigan; Philip McCarthy; Marcos de Lima
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  A unique complex translocation involving six different chromosomes in a case of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome and adverse prognosis.

Authors:  Walid Al Achkar; Abdulsamad Wafa; Hasmik Mkrtchyan; Faten Moassass; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Recent advances in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Masamitsu Yanada; Ryuzo Ohno; Tomoki Naoe
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.