Literature DB >> 11830413

Biophysical controls of carbon flows in three successional Douglas-fir stands based on eddy-covariance measurements.

Jiquan Chen1, Matthias Falk, Eugénie Euskirchen, Kyaw Tha Paw U, Thomas H Suchanek, Susan L Ustin, Barbara J Bond, Kimberley D Brosofske, Nathan Phillips, Runcheng Bi.   

Abstract

We measured net carbon flux (F(CO2)) and net H2O flux (F(H2O)) by the eddy-covariance method at three Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco)-western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.) sites located in the Wind River Valley of southern Washington State, USA. Stands were approximately 20, 40 and 450 years old and measurements were made between June 15 and October 15 of 1998 in the 40- and 450-year-old stands, and of 1999 in the 20- and 450-year-old stands. Our objectives were to determine if there were differences among the stands in: (1) patterns of daytime F(CO2) during summer and early autumn; (2) empirically modeled relationships between local climatic factors (e.g., light, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), soil water content, temperature and net radiation) and daytime F(CO2); and (3) water-use efficiency (WUE). We used the Landsberg equation, a logarithmic power function and linear regression to model relationships between F(CO2) and physical variables. Overall, given the same irradiance, F(CO2) was 1.0-3.9 mol m-2 s-1 higher (P < 0.0001 for both seasons) at the two young stands than at the old-growth stand. During summer and early autumn, F(CO2) averaged 4.2 and 6.1 mol m-2 s-1 at the 20- and 40-year-old stand, respectively. In contrast, the 450-year-old forest averaged 2.2 and 3.2 mol m-2 s-1 in 1998 and 1999, respectively. Increases in VPD were associated with reduced F(CO2) at all three stands, with the greatest apparent constraints occurring at the old-growth stand. Correlations between F(CO2) and all other environmental variables differed among ecosystems, with soil temperature showing a negative correlation and net radiation showing a positive correlation. In the old-growth stand, WUE was significantly greater (P < 0.0001) in the drier summer of 1998 (2.7 mg g-1) than in 1999 (1.0 mg g-1). Although we did not use replicates in our study, the results indicate that there are large differences in F(CO2) among Douglas-fir stands of different ages growing in the same general area, and that variations in age structure and site conditions need to be considered when scaling flux measurements from individual points to the landscape level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11830413     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/22.2-3.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  5 in total

1.  Controls on seasonal patterns of maximum ecosystem carbon uptake and canopy-scale photosynthetic light response: contributions from both temperature and photoperiod.

Authors:  Paul C Stoy; Amy M Trowbridge; William L Bauerle
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Water availability is the main climate driver of neotropical tree growth.

Authors:  Fabien Wagner; Vivien Rossi; Clément Stahl; Damien Bonal; Bruno Hérault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Light-intensity grazing improves alpine meadow productivity and adaption to climate change on the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Yangjian Zhang; Mingjie Xu; Juntao Zhu; Michael C Wimberly; Guirui Yu; Shuli Niu; Yi Xi; Xianzhou Zhang; Jingsheng Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Differential responses of net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide to light and temperature between spring and neap tides in subtropical mangrove forests.

Authors:  Qing Li; Weizhi Lu; Hui Chen; Yiqi Luo; Guanghui Lin
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-08

5.  Multiple Resource Use Efficiency (mRUE): A New Concept for Ecosystem Production.

Authors:  Juanjuan Han; Jiquan Chen; Yuan Miao; Shiqiang Wan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.