Literature DB >> 11829304

Effects of light adaptation on contrast processing in bipolar cells in the retina.

P K Fahey1, D A Burkhardt.   

Abstract

Effects of light adaptation on contrast processing in the outer retina were investigated over nearly four decades of background illumination by analyzing the intracellular responses of 111 bipolar cells, 66 horizontal cells, and 22 cone photoreceptors in the superfused eyecup of the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum). Light adaptation had striking and similar effects on the average contrast responses of the hyperpolarizing (Bh) and depolarizing (Bd) classes of bipolar cells: Over the lower two decades of background illumination, the contrast gain increased 7-fold to reach values as high as 20-30, the dynamic range and the half-maximum contrast decreased by about 60%, the total voltage range increased some 40%, and contrast dominance changed from highly positive to more balanced. At higher levels of background, most aspects of the contrast response stabilized and Weber's Law then held closely. In this background range, the contrast gain of bipolar cells was amplified some 20X relative to that of cones whereas the corresponding amplification in horizontal cells was about 6X. Differences in the growth of contrast gain with the intensity of the background illumination for cones versus bipolar cells suggest that there are at least two adaptation-dependent mechanisms regulating contrast gain. One is evident in the cone photoresponse such that an approximately linear relation holds between the steady-state hyperpolarization and contrast gain. The other arises between the voltage responses of the cones and bipolar cells. It could be presynaptic (modulation of cone transmitter release by horizontal cell feedback or other mechanisms) and/or postsynaptic, that is, intrinsic to bipolar cells. Contrast gain grew with the background intensity by a larger factor in horizontal than in bipolar cells. This provides a basis for the widely held view that light adaptation increases the strength of surround antagonism in bipolar cells. On average, the effects of light adaptation and most quantitative indices of contrast processing were remarkably similar for Bd and Bh cells, implying that both classes of bipolar cells, despite possible differences in underlying mechanisms, are about equally capable of encoding all primary aspects of contrast at all levels of light adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11829304     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523801184087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  6 in total

1.  Ambient light regulates sodium channel activity to dynamically control retinal signaling.

Authors:  Tomomi Ichinose; Peter D Lukasiewicz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Lateral interactions in the outer retina.

Authors:  Wallace B Thoreson; Stuart C Mangel
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Dopamine Regulation of GABAA Receptors Contributes to Light/Dark Modulation of the ON-Cone Bipolar Cell Receptive Field Surround in the Retina.

Authors:  Antoine Chaffiol; Masaaki Ishii; Yu Cao; Stuart C Mangel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  A high frequency resonance in the responses of retinal ganglion cells to rapidly modulated stimuli: a computer model.

Authors:  J A Miller; K S Denning; J S George; D W Marshak; G T Kenyon
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Center/surround organization of retinal bipolar cells: High correlation of fundamental responses of center and surround to sinusoidal contrasts.

Authors:  Dwight A Burkhardt; Theodore M Bartoletti; Wallace B Thoreson
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  An Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Ametropic and Anisometropic Amblyopia in Achieving the Corrected Visual Acuity of 1.0.

Authors:  Guipan Wang; Congling Zhao; Qiang Ding; Ping Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.