Literature DB >> 11829185

Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.

K Naito1, S Miyata, S Saito, K Sakurai, K Takeuchi.   

Abstract

Perception of nasal stuffiness, together with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessments were evaluated before and after nasal and/or sinus surgery in 50 Japanese adult patients. Nasal resistance on both expiration and inspiration correlated well with the patients' perceptions (P<0.05). Nasal volumes (0-4 cm and 0-7 cm) obtained from acoustic rhinometry measurements also correlated well with perception (P<0.05). No significant relationships were found between rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results. Perceptional nasal obstruction, rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results (except for the sectional areas at the I-notch) improved significantly after the operations. Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry are valuable methods for assessing nasal stuffiness, but we must take account of the differences between the two methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11829185     DOI: 10.1007/s004050100360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  8 in total

1.  Nasal obstruction following septorhinoplasty: how well does acoustic rhinometry work?

Authors:  Deniz Tuna Edizer; Ferhat Erisir; Yalcin Alimoglu; Seher Gokce
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Critical evaluation of different objective techniques of nasal airway assessment: a clinical review.

Authors:  P A R Clement; S Halewyck; F Gordts; O Michel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Awake measures of nasal resistance and upper airway resistance on CPAP during sleep.

Authors:  Maria J Masdeu; Vijay Seelall; Amit V Patel; Indu Ayappa; David M Rapoport
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  The relationship between nasal resistance to airflow and the airspace minimal cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Guilherme J M Garcia; Benjamin M Hariri; Ruchin G Patel; John S Rhee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Diode laser treatment of hypertrophic inferior turbinates and evaluation of the results with acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  Hamdi Cakli; Cemal Cingi; Emine Güven; Melek Kezban Gurbuz; Ercan Kaya
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Narrowed Posterior Nasal Airway Limits Efficacy of Anterior Septoplasty.

Authors:  David A Campbell; Masoud Gh Moghaddam; John S Rhee; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med       Date:  2020-05-29

7.  Optical rhinometry in nasal provocation testing.

Authors:  Edyta Krzych-Fałta; Adam Sybilski; Oksana Wojas; Bolesław Samoliński
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Modified Glatzel mirror test reproducibility in the evaluation of nasal patency.

Authors:  Silvana Brescovici; Renato Roithmann
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.