Literature DB >> 11827386

Comparison of sampling methods for 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, (HDI) in a commercial spray box.

Jenny Ekman1, Jan-Olof Levin, Roger Lindahl, Margit Sundgren, Anders Ostin.   

Abstract

In this study three different types of samplers for the determination of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate in air were compared. The experimental set up was a simulation of real life conditions with spray painting operations performed inside a commercial, full sized, spray box. The sampling methods were 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine impregnated on glass fibre filter, and the same reagent in impinger, and also dibutylamine in impinger. All analyses were performed by LC-MS-MS. The determined concentrations varied between 20 and 90 microg m(-3) with relative standard deviations from 7 to 17% for each method. No significant difference was found between the three methods using ANOVA with a significance level of alpha = 0.05.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11827386     DOI: 10.1039/b108249c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  1 in total

1.  Ferrocenoyl piperazide as derivatizing agent for the analysis of isocyanates and related compounds using liquid chromatography/electrochemistry/mass spectrometry (LC/EC/MS).

Authors:  Bettina Seiwert; Hartmut Henneken; Uwe Karst
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.109

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.