| Literature DB >> 11827386 |
Jenny Ekman1, Jan-Olof Levin, Roger Lindahl, Margit Sundgren, Anders Ostin.
Abstract
In this study three different types of samplers for the determination of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate in air were compared. The experimental set up was a simulation of real life conditions with spray painting operations performed inside a commercial, full sized, spray box. The sampling methods were 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine impregnated on glass fibre filter, and the same reagent in impinger, and also dibutylamine in impinger. All analyses were performed by LC-MS-MS. The determined concentrations varied between 20 and 90 microg m(-3) with relative standard deviations from 7 to 17% for each method. No significant difference was found between the three methods using ANOVA with a significance level of alpha = 0.05.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2002 PMID: 11827386 DOI: 10.1039/b108249c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Analyst ISSN: 0003-2654 Impact factor: 4.616