Analysis of sino-atrial conduction in man using premature atrial stimulation.

Sino-atrial conduction was investigated using premature atrial depolarization in 25 patients seven of whom had sino-atrial block. The results obtained in this investigation were evaluated plotting the test cycle (expressed as difference between the basic sinus cycle and the test cycle as a percentage of the basic sinus cycle) as a function of the return cycle (expressed as difference between the return cycle and the basic cycle as a percentage of the basic sinus cycle). In normal subjects, premature atrial depolarizations elicited in the last 10-20% of the spontaneous sinus cycle, produced a progressive prolongation of the return cycle and the points correlating the return cycle index to the test cycle index fell above the diagonal of the plotting system. After earlier premature atrial depolarizations, the return cycle remained of the same length, and the points correlating the return cycle index to the test cycle index fell along a line parallel to the y-axis ('plateau'). The mean value of the returning cycles (as expressed above) corresponding to the test cycles (as evaluated above) included in the first 5% of the 'plateau' can be defined as 'the sino-atrial conduction index'. This index, the sum of conduction into and out of the sinus node, was found to range from 79 to 185 ms. By assuming similar anterograde and retrograde conduction, the sino-atrial conduction time ranged from 39.5 to 97.5 ms (mean value=70 ms). In the patients with sino-atrial block, fully compensatory pauses were observed for atrial premature depolarizations elicited up to the last 25-35% of the atrial cycle, and a slow and progressive divergence from the diagonal of the plotting system was seen instead of the 'plateau'. In these patients the sino-atrial conduction index ranged from 151 to 297 ms (mean 253 ms). By assuming similar antegrade and retrograde conduction, the sino-atrial conduction time ranged from 75.5 to 148.5 ms (mean value=126.5 ms) with a statistically significant difference with respect to normal subjects (P=0.001).