Literature DB >> 11827199

Enterococcus spp. produces slime and survives in rat peritoneal macrophages.

L Baldassarri1, R Cecchini, L Bertuccini, M G Ammendolia, F Iosi, C R Arciola, L Montanaro, R Di Rosa, G Gherardi, G Dicuonzo, G Orefici, R Creti.   

Abstract

Enterococcal clinical isolates were investigated for the ability to form biofilm on inert surfaces, as a measure of slime production, in an attempt to find new possible virulence factors for these microorganisms. This property was commonly found among Enterococcus faecalis. Also E. faecium isolates were able to form biofilm, although to a lesser extent; for this species, however, biofilm formation seemed more frequently associated with isolates from infection rather than with environmental strains or isolates from healthy individuals. Biofilm formation was strongly affected by the presence of an additional carbohydrate source in the medium, or by iron deprivation, indicating a role of slime for survival in stressful conditions. Slime-producing E. faecalis were able to survive inside peritoneal macrophages for extended periods compared to slime-negative strains or to slime-positive bacteria grown in conditions depressing slime production. In particular, slime-producing and slime-negative cells showed a decrease of 1 and 2 log units, respectively, at 1 h after infection; slime-negative cells were then rapidly killed, with clearance of bacterial cells at 24 h. Slime-producing bacteria persisted up to 48 h, which was the last time point examined, as after that time viability of both infected and non-infected macrophages started to decline. Scanning electron microscopy observations showed the presence of abundant amorphous extracellular material, of possible polysaccharide nature, embedding bacterial cells to form a multilayered biofilm. Even in conditions not supporting biofilm formation, bacterial cells appeared capsulated, suggesting that capsule and slime might represent different structures. Genes belonging to the epa locus or to a putative icaA homolog did not seem to be involved in synthesis and export of slime.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11827199     DOI: 10.1007/s00430-001-0096-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0300-8584            Impact factor:   3.402


  44 in total

1.  Lack of correlation of gelatinase production and biofilm formation in a large collection of Enterococcus faecalis isolates.

Authors:  Jamal A Mohamed; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Alanine esters of enterococcal lipoteichoic acid play a role in biofilm formation and resistance to antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Francesca Fabretti; Christian Theilacker; Lucilla Baldassarri; Zbigniew Kaczynski; Andrea Kropec; Otto Holst; Johannes Huebner
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Therapeutic failures of antibiotics used to treat macrolide-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes infections may be due to biofilm formation.

Authors:  Lucilla Baldassarri; Roberta Creti; Simona Recchia; Monica Imperi; Bruna Facinelli; Eleonora Giovanetti; Marco Pataracchia; Giovanna Alfarone; Graziella Orefici
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Bacteriophage φEf11 ORF28 Endolysin, a Multifunctional Lytic Enzyme with Properties Distinct from All Other Identified Enterococcus faecalis Phage Endolysins.

Authors:  Hongming Zhang; Roy H Stevens; Bettina A Buttaro; Derrick E Fouts; Salar Sanjari; Bradley S Evans
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Influence of isolate origin and presence of various genes on biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Sam Almohamad; Sudha R Somarajan; Kavindra V Singh; Sreedhar R Nallapareddy; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Cyclooxygenase-2 generates the endogenous mutagen trans-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in Enterococcus faecalis-infected macrophages.

Authors:  Xingmin Wang; Toby D Allen; Yonghong Yang; Danny R Moore; Mark M Huycke
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-01-15

7.  Enterococcal surface protein, Esp, enhances biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Preeti M Tendolkar; Arto S Baghdayan; Michael S Gilmore; Nathan Shankar
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Enterococcal surface protein Esp is important for biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecium E1162.

Authors:  Esther Heikens; Marc J M Bonten; Rob J L Willems
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Sex pheromone response, clumping, and slime production in enterococcal strains isolated from occluded biliary stents.

Authors:  Gianfranco Donelli; Claudia Paoletti; Lucilla Baldassarri; Emilio Guaglianone; Roberta Di Rosa; Gloria Magi; Cinzia Spinaci; Bruna Facinelli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Virulence factors and in vitro adherence of Enterococcus strains to urinary catheters.

Authors:  E Dworniczek; K Kuzko; E Mróz; Ł Wojciech; R Adamski; B Sobieszczańska; A Seniuk
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.