Literature DB >> 11826995

The population requirement for cataract extraction: a cross-sectional study.

A Frost1, C Hopper, S Frankel, T J Peters, J Durant, J Sparrow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the distribution in the population of indications for cataract extraction in order to relate demand for this procedure to the capacity for satisfying it.
METHODS: An age-stratified random population sample of 2783 individuals aged 55 years and over was taken from inner-city, urban and rural areas of Avon and Somerset. The requirement for cataract extraction was estimated on the basis of measures of vision-related quality of life, refracted visual acuity, and application of the Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System. Data were also collected concerning suitability for surgery, including relative contraindications to surgery and whether participants considered their eyesight bad enough to merit surgery. Three sets of composite indications were defined.
RESULTS: Estimated prevalent requirements for cataract extraction for the three sets of composite criteria were: 29 per 1000 aged over 55 years (95% CI 20-41) for the most inclusive criterion; 17 per thousand (95% CI 10-27) for the intermediate criterion; and 7 per thousand (95% CI 3-14) for the most stringent criterion. These rates are equivalent to a national prevalent requirement for England of 384,000 for the most inclusive criterion. If the approximately 15% of individuals whose desire or fitness for surgery was questionable are removed from this estimate, the prevalent requirement, including the backlog from previous unsatisfied demand, becomes 325,000 individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest only a modest imbalance between supply and demand for cataract surgery. In particular there was a very small prevalence of untreated severe cataract, less than the annual health service surgical capacity, suggesting that the current National Health Service surgical capacity is adequate for cases of severe cataract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11826995     DOI: 10.1038/eye.2001.242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Local funding would reduce waiting lists for cataracts.

Authors:  Richard Harrad
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-02

2.  The relative contribution of medical and surgical referrals to the workload in general ophthalmic practice.

Authors:  K Greiner; K McCormack; A Grant; J V Forrester
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Time trends and geographical variation in cataract surgery rates in England: study of surgical workload.

Authors:  Tiarnan Keenan; Paul Rosen; David Yeates; Michael Goldacre
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures: a head-to-head comparison of the psychometric performance and patient acceptability of the Cat-PROM5 and Catquest-9SF self-report questionnaires.

Authors:  J M Sparrow; M T Grzeda; N A Frost; R L Johnston; C S C Liu; L Edwards; A Loose; D Elliott; J L Donovan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.