PURPOSE: Determination of the reasons for clinically significant unplanned ametropia following cataract surgery and the results of management of the ametropia. METHODS: Retrospective review of 11 consecutive cases of tertiary referral for management of pseudophakic ametropia to the authors. Corrective surgery involved either lens implant exchange or LASIK refractive surgery. Final outcome was assessed by uncorrected and best spectacle corrected visual acuity and manifest refractive outcome. RESULTS: Five cases (45%) were due to significant error in axial length determination at pre-surgery biometry. Six cases (55%) were due to surgeon or surgical team error, where the surgeon implanted a lens of power at variance with that specified pre-operatively. Nine patients elected to undergo refractive surgery to correct the ametropia and 2 elected to wear a spectacle lens. Seven underwent lens implant exchange and 2 patients underwent LASIK keratorefractive surgery. Eight of nine patients were within 1 dioptre of intended spherical equivalent after refractive surgery and 1 patients was -1.5 dioptre myopic. CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of serious unintended ametropia after cataract surgery are avoidable. Care should be taken with the biometry and procedural checks to minimise error. When lens implant exchange or LASIK was performed the final refractive results were satisfactory.
PURPOSE: Determination of the reasons for clinically significant unplanned ametropia following cataract surgery and the results of management of the ametropia. METHODS: Retrospective review of 11 consecutive cases of tertiary referral for management of pseudophakic ametropia to the authors. Corrective surgery involved either lens implant exchange or LASIK refractive surgery. Final outcome was assessed by uncorrected and best spectacle corrected visual acuity and manifest refractive outcome. RESULTS: Five cases (45%) were due to significant error in axial length determination at pre-surgery biometry. Six cases (55%) were due to surgeon or surgical team error, where the surgeon implanted a lens of power at variance with that specified pre-operatively. Nine patients elected to undergo refractive surgery to correct the ametropia and 2 elected to wear a spectacle lens. Seven underwent lens implant exchange and 2 patients underwent LASIK keratorefractive surgery. Eight of nine patients were within 1 dioptre of intended spherical equivalent after refractive surgery and 1 patients was -1.5 dioptre myopic. CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of serious unintended ametropia after cataract surgery are avoidable. Care should be taken with the biometry and procedural checks to minimise error. When lens implant exchange or LASIK was performed the final refractive results were satisfactory.