Literature DB >> 11826576

[Association of D-dimer and helicoidal thoracic scanner for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Prospective study of 106 ambulatory patients].

G Pacouret1, O Marie, D Alison, B Delahousse, O Fichaux, P Peycher, D Djeffal Vincentelli, J M Potier, Y Gruel, B Charbonnier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ventilation/perfusion pulmonary scintigraphy (PS), the current mainspring in the diagnosis of pulmonary oedema (PE), is frequently non-conclusive. The objective of this study was to determine, prospectively, the diagnostic value of the association of D-dimers and helicoidal thoracic scanner (HTS) in a continuous series of ambulatory adults with suspected PE and admitted to a cardiologic emergency unit.
METHODS: Exclusion criteria were as follows: symptoms or clinical signs of seventy, contraindication for HTS and/or on pulmonary angiography, curative anticoagulant therapy for more than 48 hours, history of PE less than 3 months before or the impossibility of conducting all the examinations with 48 hours. All the patients underwent determination of D-dimers by rapid ELISA test, HTS and 2 reference examinations, venous Doppler of the lower limbs and a PS, completed by pulmonary angiography if the PS did not permit diagnosis and the venous Doppler was negative.
RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were selected over a recruitment period of 18 months. The prevalence of PE was of 45% (48/106). Forty-four of the 48 PE of the series were central form. HTS was considered dubious in 10 patients (10.4%, PE+ n = 2, PE- n = 8). The results of D-dimers were negative in only 34.5% patients without PE (20/58). Pulmonary angiography was necessary in 15 patients. The negative and positive predictive values of D-dimers were respectively of 100 and 55.8% (48/86) and those of HTS respectively 100 (46/46) and 92% (46/50).
CONCLUSION: The diagnostic strategy of clinical suspicion of PE, starting with determination of D-dimers by rapid ELISA test followed by helicoidal thoracic scanner in the case of a positive result, was particularly effective in this series of patients with a high prevalence of PE. These results must be confirmed in a larger series and in a general emergency unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11826576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Presse Med        ISSN: 0755-4982            Impact factor:   1.228


  3 in total

1.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Wendy Lim; Grégoire Le Gal; Shannon M Bates; Marc Righini; Linda B Haramati; Eddy Lang; Jeffrey A Kline; Sonja Chasteen; Marcia Snyder; Payal Patel; Meha Bhatt; Parth Patel; Cody Braun; Housne Begum; Wojtek Wiercioch; Holger J Schünemann; Reem A Mustafa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Parth Patel; Payal Patel; Meha Bhatt; Cody Braun; Housne Begum; Wojtek Wiercioch; Jamie Varghese; David Wooldridge; Hani Alturkmani; Merrill Thomas; Mariam Baig; Waled Bahaj; Rasha Khatib; Rohan Kehar; Rakesh Ponnapureddy; Anchal Sethi; Ahmad Mustafa; Wendy Lim; Grégoire Le Gal; Shannon M Bates; Linda B Haramati; Jeffrey Kline; Eddy Lang; Marc Righini; Mohamad A Kalot; Nedaa M Husainat; Yazan Nayif Al Jabiri; Holger J Schünemann; Reem A Mustafa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-09-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.