Literature DB >> 11826070

Neural correlates of tasting concentrated quinine and sugar solutions.

David H Zald1, Mathew C Hagen, José V Pardo.   

Abstract

Behavioral, ethological, and electrophysiological evidence suggests that the highly unpleasant, bitter taste of a concentrated quinine hydrochloride (QHCL) should activate the human amygdala. In the present study, healthy subjects tasted 0.02 M QHCL or water while regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was assayed with H(2)(15)O PET. Subjects were also studied while tasting a pleasant sucrose solution and resting with eyes closed (ECR). Tasting QHCL significantly increased rCBF within the left amygdala relative to control conditions of tasting water and ECR. Sucrose and water caused small to moderate rCBF increases in the amygdala relative to ECR, but sucrose did not significantly increase activity within either amygdalae relative to water. In the frontal lobe, QHCL and sucrose both activated the right posterior orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) relative to water, but portions of the anterior OFC and inferior frontal pole showed valence specific responses to QHCL. These data indicate that the left amygdala responds robustly to QHCL and more moderately to nonaversive sapid stimuli, both pleasant and unpleasant gustatory stimuli activate the right posterior OFC, and the left inferior frontal pole/anterior OFC demonstrates valence-specific responses to aversive gustatory stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11826070     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00358.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Comparing apples and oranges: using reward-specific and reward-general subjective value representation in the brain.

Authors:  Dino J Levy; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor.

Authors:  Dana M Small; John Prescott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A 3 T event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of primary and secondary gustatory cortex localization using natural tastants.

Authors:  Marion Smits; Ronald R Peeters; Paul van Hecke; Stefan Sunaert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  The contribution of ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to response reversal.

Authors:  D G V Mitchell; R A Rhodes; D S Pine; R J R Blair
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Leaving a bad taste in your mouth but not in my insula.

Authors:  Elisabeth A H von dem Hagen; John D Beaver; Michael P Ewbank; Jill Keane; Luca Passamonti; Andrew D Lawrence; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Functional neuroimaging of gastric distention.

Authors:  Elke Stephan; José V Pardo; Patricia L Faris; Boyd K Hartman; Suck W Kim; Emil H Ivanov; Randy S Daughters; Patricia A Costello; Robert L Goodale
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Ventromedial prefrontal cortex response to concentrated sucrose reflects liking rather than sweet quality coding.

Authors:  Kristin J Rudenga; Dana M Small
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Medial-lateral organization of the orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Erin L Rich; Jonathan D Wallis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Effect of Magnitude Estimation of Pleasantness and Intensity on fMRI Activation to Taste.

Authors:  B Cerf-Ducastel; L Haase; C Murphy
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Associations between brain structure and perceived intensity of sweet and bitter tastes.

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Lachlan T Strike; Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Greig I de Zubicaray; Katie McMahon; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.