Literature DB >> 11825835

Shock index in the first trimester of pregnancy and its relationship to ruptured ectopic pregnancy.

Robert H Birkhahn1, Theodore J Gaeta, Robert Bei, Joseph J Bove.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The shock index (SI), the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure, has been reported to be a useful tool in the evaluation of trauma patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).
OBJECTIVES: To determine the range of values for SI seen in first-trimester patients presenting to the ED, and to estimate the ability of the SI to predict ruptured ectopic pregnancy (EP).
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study enrolling all patients in the first trimester of pregnancy presenting to the ED with abdominal pain and/or vaginal bleeding. Patients had a SI calculated based on their presenting vital signs, and were followed longitudinally to determine a final diagnosis. Ectopic pregnancies were categorized based on surgical pathology. Mean levels for SI were determined for each group, and ruptured EPs were compared with all other pregnancies using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 280 patients, 24 ruptured EPs, 28 unruptured EPs, and 228 non-EPs. The means for SI were 0.67 (95% CI = 0.65 to 0.68) for non-EPs, 0.64 (95% CI = 0.61 to 0.67) for unruptured EPs, and 0.84 (95% CI = 0.77 to 0.9) for ruptured EPs. The ROC curve for SI, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and systolic blood pressure demonstrated areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.88), 0.74 (95% CI = 0.67 to 0.79), 0.63 (95% CI = 0.67 to 0.79), and 0.70 (95% CI = 0.64 to 0.77), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The range of values for SI for patients being evaluated for pain and/or vaginal bleeding within the first trimester of pregnancy, who do not have a ruptured EP, are within the previously reported range of 0.5-0.7 for nonpregnant patients. A SI > 0.85 made the diagnosis of ruptured EP 15.0 (95% CI = 5.6 to 40.4) times more likely. This study suggests that SI could impact directly on the diagnostic and therapeutic course of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11825835     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb00226.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  9 in total

1.  Optimal Combination of Non-Invasive Tools for the Early Detection of Potentially Life-Threatening Emergencies in Gynecology.

Authors:  Catalina Varas; Marion Ravit; Camille Mimoun; Pierre Panel; Cyrille Huchon; Arnaud Fauconnier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Determination of Normal Ranges of Shock Index and Other Haemodynamic Variables in the Immediate Postpartum Period: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hannah L Nathan; Kate Cottam; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Paul T Seed; Annette Briley; Susan Bewley; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Innovations in vital signs measurement for the detection of hypertension and shock in pregnancy.

Authors:  Nicola Vousden; Hannah L Nathan; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Shock index in the emergency department: utility and limitations.

Authors:  Erica Koch; Shannon Lovett; Trac Nghiem; Robert A Riggs; Megan A Rech
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2019-08-14

5.  Shock index thresholds to predict adverse outcomes in maternal hemorrhage and sepsis: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hannah L Nathan; Paul T Seed; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Annemarie De Greeff; Elodie Lawley; John Anthony; Wilhelm Steyn; David R Hall; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 6.  A systematic review of the relationship between blood loss and clinical signs.

Authors:  Rodolfo Carvalho Pacagnella; João Paulo Souza; Jill Durocher; Pablo Perel; Jennifer Blum; Beverly Winikoff; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The shock index as a predictor of vasopressor use in emergency department patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Charles R Wira; Melissa W Francis; Sundeep Bhat; Robert Ehrman; David Conner; Mark Siegel
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-02

8.  Shock index and prediction of traumatic hemorrhagic shock 28-day mortality: data from the DCLHb resuscitation clinical trials.

Authors:  Edward P Sloan; Max Koenigsberg; James M Clark; William B Weir; Nora Philbin
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-09-25

9.  The Shock Index revisited - a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU.

Authors:  Manuel Mutschler; Ulrike Nienaber; Matthias Münzberg; Christoph Wölfl; Herbert Schoechl; Thomas Paffrath; Bertil Bouillon; Marc Maegele
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.