Literature DB >> 11825217

A study of abbreviations in the UMLS.

H Liu1, Y A Lussier, C Friedman.   

Abstract

Abbreviations are widely used in medicine. The understanding of abbreviations is important for medical language processing and information retrieval systems. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) contains a large number of abbreviations. We hypothesized that extracting and studying the UMLS abbreviations can be helpful for understanding the characteristics of abbreviations in medicine. In this paper, we describe a method for extracting abbreviations from the UMLS. We evaluated the method and studied the ambiguous nature of the abbreviations. In addition, the coverage of the UMLS abbreviations in medical reports was studied. Using our method, we extracted 163,666 unique (abbreviation, full form) pairs from the UMLS with a precision of 97.5%, and a recall of 96%. The UMLS abbreviations were highly ambiguous: 33.1% of abbreviations with six characters or less had multiple meanings; the average number of different full forms for all abbreviations with six characters or less was 2.28. The coverage of the UMLS abbreviations in medical reports was over 66%.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11825217      PMCID: PMC2243414     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  6 in total

1.  PNAD-CSS: a workbench for constructing a protein name abbreviation dictionary.

Authors:  M Yoshida; K Fukuda; T Takagi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  UMLS concept indexing for production databases: a feasibility study.

Authors:  P Nadkarni; R Chen; C Brandt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  The effect of abbreviations on MEDLINE searching.

Authors:  C S Federiuk
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  A broad-coverage natural language processing system.

Authors:  C Friedman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

5.  Better use of abbreviations--a lesson from a stroke unit.

Authors:  T Luxton; H Al-Qassab
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 6.  Acronyms, abbreviations and initialisms.

Authors:  D A Bloom
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.588

  6 in total
  30 in total

1.  "Understanding" medical school curriculum content using KnowledgeMap.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Jeffrey D Smithers; Randolph A Miller; Anderson Spickard
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Creating an online dictionary of abbreviations from MEDLINE.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Chang; Hinrich Schütze; Russ B Altman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Automatic resolution of ambiguous terms based on machine learning and conceptual relations in the UMLS.

Authors:  Hongfang Liu; Stephen B Johnson; Carol Friedman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  A study of abbreviations in MEDLINE abstracts.

Authors:  Hongfang Liu; Alan R Aronson; Carol Friedman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

5.  The sublanguage of cross-coverage.

Authors:  Peter D Stetson; Stephen B Johnson; Matthew Scotch; George Hripcsak
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

6.  The German specialist lexicon.

Authors:  Gesa Weske-Heck; Albrecht Zaiss; Matthias Zabel; Stefan Schulz; Wolfgang Giere; Michael Schopen; Rüdiger Klar
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

7.  Automated encoding of clinical documents based on natural language processing.

Authors:  Carol Friedman; Lyudmila Shagina; Yves Lussier; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Detecting abbreviations in discharge summaries using machine learning methods.

Authors:  Yonghui Wu; S Trent Rosenbloom; Joshua C Denny; Randolph A Miller; Subramani Mani; Dario A Giuse; Hua Xu
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

9.  Using UMLS lexical resources to disambiguate abbreviations in clinical text.

Authors:  Youngjun Kim; John Hurdle; Stéphane M Meystre
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

10.  Coreference analysis in clinical notes: a multi-pass sieve with alternate anaphora resolution modules.

Authors:  Siddhartha Reddy Jonnalagadda; Dingcheng Li; Sunghwan Sohn; Stephen Tze-Inn Wu; Kavishwar Wagholikar; Manabu Torii; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.