Literature DB >> 11825182

Quality improvement in pediatric well care with an electronic record.

P C Gioia1.   

Abstract

For the past 4 years the pediatric office of Children's Health Specialists has used an electronic medical record (EMR). The EMR has forms for the routine well child visits recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) [1] and instruction sheets with key information on development and safety as recommended by "Bright Futures" [2]. In this study the completeness of well visits, instruction distribution, immunizations and lead testing were examined for all children in our practice with birthdays in 1998. When children did get to the office they did get their instruction sheets on child development and safety and were well immunized. Children who had insurance coverage to pay for in-office lead testing were 42.6 times more likely to have blood lead testing done: Risk Ratio 42.6, lower limit 10.6, upper limit 171.3. Insurance coverage and regulatory changes would likely increase lead screening markedly in high risk populations. Our implementation of our EMR has helped us to deliver high quality pediatric well child care but external obstacles limit the completeness of the care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11825182      PMCID: PMC2243516     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  4 in total

1.  Impact of an electronic medical record system on community-based primary care practices.

Authors:  K A Wager; F W Lee; A W White; D M Ward; S M Ornstein
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

2.  National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19-35 months--United States, 1997.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1998-07-10       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Association of lower continuity of care with greater risk of emergency department use and hospitalization in children.

Authors:  D A Christakis; L Mell; T D Koepsell; F J Zimmerman; F A Connell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Anticipatory guidance: what information do parents receive? What information do they want?

Authors:  M A Schuster; N Duan; M Regalado; D J Klein
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2000-12
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Automated primary care screening in pediatric waiting rooms.

Authors:  Vibha Anand; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Interventions to improve screening and follow-up in primary care: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jeanne Van Cleave; Karen A Kuhlthau; Sheila Bloom; Paul W Newacheck; Alixandra A Nozzolillo; Charles J Homer; James M Perrin
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 3.  Research on Clinical Preventive Services for Adolescents and Young Adults: Where Are We and Where Do We Need to Go?

Authors:  Sion K Harris; Matthew C Aalsma; Elissa R Weitzman; Diego Garcia-Huidobro; Charlene Wong; Scott E Hadland; John Santelli; M Jane Park; Elizabeth M Ozer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  A cluster randomized clinical trial to improve prescribing patterns in ambulatory pediatrics.

Authors:  Robert L Davis; Jeffrey Wright; Francie Chalmers; Linda Levenson; Julie C Brown; Paula Lozano; Dimitri A Christakis
Journal:  PLoS Clin Trials       Date:  2007-05-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.