Literature DB >> 11825151

Finding appropriate clinical trials: evaluating encoded eligibility criteria with incomplete data.

N Ash1, O Ogunyemi, Q Zeng, L Ohno-Machado.   

Abstract

We describe our work on creating a system that selects appropriate clinical trials by automating the evaluation of eligibility criteria. We developed a data model of eligibility for breast cancer clinical trials, upon which the criteria were encoded. Standard vocabularies are utilized to represent concepts used in the system, and retrieve their hierarchical relationships. The system incorporates Bayesian networks to handle missing patient information. Protocols are ranked by the belief that the patient is eligible for each of them. In a preliminary evaluation, we found good agreement (kappa 0.86) between the system and an independent physician in selection of protocols, but poor agreement (kappa 0.24) in protocol ranking. We conclude that our approach is feasible, and potentially useful in assisting both physicians and patients in the task of selecting appropriate trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11825151      PMCID: PMC2243370     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  8 in total

1.  Tool support for authoring eligibility criteria for cancer trials.

Authors:  D L Rubin; J H Gennari; S Srinivas; A Yuen; H Kaizer; M A Musen; J S Silva
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Pilot study of a point-of-use decision support tool for cancer clinical trials eligibility.

Authors:  P P Breitfeld; M Weisburd; J M Overhage; G Sledge; W M Tierney
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Better access to information about clinical trials.

Authors:  A T McCray
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Participatory design and an eligibility screening tool.

Authors:  J H Gennari; M Reddy
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

5.  The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L A Ries; P A Wingo; D S Miller; H L Howe; H K Weir; H M Rosenberg; S W Vernon; K Cronin; B K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  An expert system for assigning patients into clinical trials based on Bayesian networks.

Authors:  C Papaconstantinou; G Theocharous; S Mahadevan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Decision support for clinical trial eligibility determination in breast cancer.

Authors:  L Ohno-Machado; S J Wang; P Mar; A A Boxwala
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

8.  A methodology for determining patients' eligibility for clinical trials.

Authors:  S W Tu; C A Kemper; N M Lane; R W Carlson; M A Musen
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.176

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Development of an electronic health record-based Clinical Trial Alert system to enhance recruitment at the point of care.

Authors:  Peter J Embi; Anil Jain; Jeffrey Clark; C Martin Harris
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

2.  Accelerating Biopharmaceutical Development in the Decade of Health Information Technology: Applications of EHRs for outcomes research and clinical trials recruitment.

Authors:  Michael I Lieberman; Peter Embi; Thomas N Ricciardi; Kevin Tabb
Journal:  Biotechnol Healthc       Date:  2005-08

3.  Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: measuring efficiency and flexibility.

Authors:  Lynne Penberthy; Richard Brown; Federico Puma; Bassam Dahman
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Effect of a clinical trial alert system on physician participation in trial recruitment.

Authors:  Peter J Embi; Anil Jain; Jeffrey Clark; Susan Bizjack; Richard Hornung; C Martin Harris
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-10-24

5.  Design and multicentric implementation of a generic software architecture for patient recruitment systems re-using existing HIS tools and routine patient data.

Authors:  B Trinczek; F Köpcke; T Leusch; R W Majeed; B Schreiweis; J Wenk; B Bergh; C Ohmann; R Röhrig; H U Prokosch; M Dugas
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Leveraging Real-World Data for the Selection of Relevant Eligibility Criteria for the Implementation of Electronic Recruitment Support in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Georg Melzer; Tim Maiwald; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Thomas Ganslandt
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Adoption, acceptability, and accuracy of an online clinical trial matching website for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellyn Cohen; Jeff Belkora; Joanne Tyler; Joan Schreiner; Mary Jo Deering; Lakshmi Grama; Brenda Duggan; Julie Illi; Julia Pederson; Aprajita Anand; Alexandra Teng; Erin McCreary; Dan Moore; Debu Tripathy; Michael Hogarth; Morton Lieberman; John Park; Laura Esserman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  Employing computers for the recruitment into clinical trials: a comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Felix Köpcke; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Physicians' perceptions of an electronic health record-based clinical trial alert approach to subject recruitment: a survey.

Authors:  Peter J Embi; Anil Jain; C Martin Harris
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.