Literature DB >> 11824887

Prospective randomized comparison of dacarbazine (DTIC) versus DTIC plus interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in metastatic melanoma.

A M Young1, J Marsden, A Goodman, A Burton, J A Dunn.   

Abstract

Dacarbazine (DTIC) has been the mainstay of chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma for over two decades, but only 15%-20% of patients respond and benefit is usually transient. Randomized studies combining DTIC with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in advanced disease have so far been inconclusive in terms of response and survival. We report a randomized prospective pilot Phase III trial of DTIC +IFN-alpha in patients with metastatic melanoma. The primary endpoint was death. A total of 61 patients were randomized between April 1995 and April 1998. Differences in survival between groups were assessed using log-rank analysis. Quality of life was measured using the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 (+3) questionnaire. Fifty-seven patients died during the study. The median survival for patients receiving DTIC was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-9.0); it was 4.8 months for DTIC + IFN-alpha (95% CI 2.0-8.0). There was no significant difference in survival between the two treatment arms (chi2 unadjusted = 0.15, P = 0.70; chi2 adjusted = 0.01, P = 0.91). The 6-month survival of those patients randomized to DTIC alone was 58% compared with 40% for those patients randomized to DTIC + IFN-alpha. There were no differences in quality of life between treatment groups. This study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit for patients receiving IFN-alpha in combination with DTIC. These results are inconclusive primarily owing to the small size of the trial. A meta-analysis is required to determine whether there is a role for the addition of IFN-alpha to DTIC in the treatment of this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11824887     DOI: 10.1053/clon.2001.9314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  13 in total

1.  Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of imidazole and imidazoline analogs for melanoma.

Authors:  Jianjun Chen; Zhao Wang; Yan Lu; James T Dalton; Duane D Miller; Wei Li
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Identifying novel molecular structures for advanced melanoma by ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Zhao Wang; Yan Lu; William Seibel; Duane D Miller; Wei Li
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  [Malignant head and neck melanoma: Part 2: Therapy].

Authors:  C Pföhler; T Vogt; C S L Müller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Health related quality of life outcomes for unresectable stage III or IV melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab treatment.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Gerald Linette; Christian H Ottensmeier; Shima Safikhani; Marianne Messina; Axel Hoos; Samuel Wagner; Srividya Kotapati
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 5.  Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Sandro Pasquali; Andreas V Hadjinicolaou; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Simone Mocellin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-06

Review 6.  WITHDRAWN: Chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy for metastatic malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Andre D Sasse; Emma C Sasse; Luciana Go Clark; Otavio Augusto Camara Clark
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-06

7.  Phase 2 Study of Intralesional PV-10 in Refractory Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  John F Thompson; Sanjiv S Agarwala; B Mark Smithers; Merrick I Ross; Charles R Scoggins; Brendon J Coventry; Susan J Neuhaus; David R Minor; Jamie M Singer; Eric A Wachter
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Immunotherapy of distant metastatic disease.

Authors:  D Schadendorf; S M Algarra; L Bastholt; G Cinat; B Dreno; A M M Eggermont; E Espinosa; J Guo; A Hauschild; T Petrella; J Schachter; P Hersey
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Meta-regression models to address heterogeneity and inconsistency in network meta-analysis of survival outcomes.

Authors:  Jeroen P Jansen; Shannon Cope
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Quantitative summaries of treatment effect estimates obtained with network meta-analysis of survival curves to inform decision-making.

Authors:  Shannon Cope; Jeroen P Jansen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.