Literature DB >> 11824687

The genomic revolution: what does it mean for risk assessment?

W E Bishop1, D P Clarke, C C Travis.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11824687     DOI： 10.1111/0272-4332.216167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN： 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Proteomics in zebrafish exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  E A Shrader; T R Henry; M S Greeley; B P Bradley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Biochemical biomarkers in environmental studies--lessons learnt from enzymes catalase, glutathione S-transferase and cholinesterase in two crustacean species.

Authors:  Anita Jemec; Damjana Drobne; Tatjana Tisler; Kristina Sepcić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  In vivo-in vitro toxicogenomic comparison of TCDD-elicited gene expression in Hepa1c1c7 mouse hepatoma cells and C57BL/6 hepatic tissue.

Authors:  Edward Dere; Darrell R Boverhof; Lyle D Burgoon; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Collembase: a repository for springtail genomics and soil quality assessment.

Authors:  Martijn J T N Timmermans; Muriel E de Boer; Benjamin Nota; Tjalf E de Boer; Janine Mariën; Rene M Klein-Lankhorst; Nico M van Straalen; Dick Roelofs
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 3.969
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.