Literature DB >> 11824648

Sources of variability in the clinical photostress test.

Tom H Margrain1, David Thomson.   

Abstract

The photostress test is a simple clinical technique that can differentiate between retinal and postretinal disease. Unfortunately a wide range of normal results have been reported in the literature and it is perhaps for this reason that the test has been little used by clinicians. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of photostress technique, age, ametropia, pupil size and acuity on photostress recovery time (PSRT) in normal subjects. Photostress recovery time was measured in 50 healthy subjects whose ages ranged from 21 to 69 using three clinically applicable techniques and a reference technique designed to bleach a consistent amount of photopigment. The agreement between each clinical technique and the reference technique was determined. Mean photostress recovery time differed for each of the techniques studied. Analysis of the data obtained with the reference and the best clinical technique showed that age was the only factor that had a significant effect on PSRT. The best clinical technique involves exposing the eye to the light from the direct ophthalmoscope for 30 s and measuring the time taken for acuity to return to within one line of pre-bleach acuity. Photostress recovery time increases with age but is independent of pupil size, ametropia and visual acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11824648     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  9 in total

Review 1.  Why HID headlights bother older drivers.

Authors:  M A Mainster; G T Timberlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The influence of age on the recovery of the ERG photostress test.

Authors:  D Messenio; G Marano; S Gerosa; F Iannelli; E M Biganzoli
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  A comparative study of the usefulness of color vision, photostress recovery time, and visual evoked potential tests in early detection of ocular toxicity from hydroxychloroquine.

Authors:  Javad Heravian; Massoud Saghafi; Naser Shoeibi; Samira Hassanzadeh; Mohammad Taghi Shakeri; Maria Sharepoor
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Contrast-Sensitivity Function and Photo Stress-Recovery Time in Prediabetes.

Authors:  Prema K Chande; Rajiv Raman; Preethi John; Sangeetha Srinivasan
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2020-09-18

5.  Effect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time.

Authors:  J S Wolffsohn; S J Anderson; J Mitchell; A Woodcock; M Rubinstein; T Ffytche; A Browning; K Willbond; W M Amoaku; C Bradley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  [Readaptation time after photo-stress in normal subjects and glaucoma patients].

Authors:  B Kamppeter; R F Degenring; J B Jonas
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  The German AugUR study: study protocol of a prospective study to investigate chronic diseases in the elderly.

Authors:  Klaus Stark; Matthias Olden; Caroline Brandl; Alexander Dietl; Martina E Zimmermann; Sabine C Schelter; Julika Loss; Michael F Leitzmann; Carsten A Böger; Andreas Luchner; Florian Kronenberg; Horst Helbig; Bernhard H F Weber; Iris M Heid
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Cone photoreceptor macular function and recovery after photostress in early non-exudative age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  John D Rodriguez; Keith Lane; David A Hollander; Aron Shapiro; Sunita Saigal; Andrew J Hertsenberg; Garrick Wallstrom; Divya Narayanan; Endri Angjeli; Mark B Abelson
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-27

9.  An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye.

Authors:  John D Rodriguez; Garrick Wallstrom; Divya Narayanan; Donna Welch; Mark B Abelson
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 1.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.