Literature DB >> 11823759

Comparative angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy volunteers: the importance of dosing.

Marc P Maillard1, Grégoire Würzner, Jürg Nussberger, Catherine Centeno, Michel Burnier, Hans R Brunner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We have reported previously that 80 mg valsartan and 50 mg losartan provide less receptor blockade than 150 mg irbesartan in normotensive subjects. In this study we investigated the importance of drug dosing in mediating these differences by comparing the AT(1)-receptor blockade induced by 3 doses of valsartan with that obtained with 3 other antagonists at given doses.
METHODS: Valsartan (80, 160, and 320 mg), 50 mg losartan, 150 mg irbesartan, and 8 mg candesartan were administered to 24 healthy subjects in a randomized, open-label, 3-period crossover study. All doses were given once daily for 8 days. The angiotensin II receptor blockade was assessed with two techniques, the reactive rise in plasma renin activity and an in vitro radioreceptor binding assay that quantified the displacement of angiotensin II by the blocking agents. Measurements were obtained before and 4 and 24 hours after drug intake on days 1 and 8.
RESULTS: At 4 and 24 hours, valsartan induced a dose-dependent "blockade" of AT(1) receptors. Compared with other antagonists, 80 mg valsartan and 50 mg losartan had a comparable profile. The 160-mg and 320-mg doses of valsartan blocked AT(1) receptors at 4 hours by 80%, which was similar to the effect of 150 mg irbesartan. At trough, however, the valsartan-induced blockade was slightly less than that obtained with irbesartan. With use of plasma renin activity as a marker of receptor blockade, on day 8, 160 mg valsartan was equivalent to 150 mg irbesartan and 8 mg candesartan.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the differences in angiotensin II receptor blockade observed with the various AT(1) antagonists are explained mainly by differences in dosing. When 160-mg or 320-mg doses were investigated, the effects of valsartan hardly differed from those obtained with recommended doses of irbesartan and candesartan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11823759     DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2002.121425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  19 in total

Review 1.  International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCIX. Angiotensin Receptors: Interpreters of Pathophysiological Angiotensinergic Stimuli [corrected].

Authors:  Sadashiva S Karnik; Hamiyet Unal; Jacqueline R Kemp; Kalyan C Tirupula; Satoru Eguchi; Patrick M L Vanderheyden; Walter G Thomas
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Angiotensin II receptor blocker-induces blunted taste sensitivity: comparison of candesartan and valsartan.

Authors:  Shuichi Tsuruoka; Michi Wakaumi; Takashi Ioka; Hisashi Yamamoto; Hitoshi Ando; Kohichi Sugimoto; Akio Fujimura
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Desirable therapeutic characteristics of an optimal antihypertensive agent.

Authors:  Lisa Mustone Alexander
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Angiotensin vaccination: what is the prospect of success?

Authors:  Duncan J Campbell
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  G Neil Thomas; Paul Chan; Brian Tomlinson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of valsartan in patients with chronic stable heart failure.

Authors:  Inder S Anand; Anita Deswal; Dean J Kereiakes; Das Purkayastha; Dion H Zappe
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 7.  Blocking the RAAS at different levels: an update on the use of the direct renin inhibitors alone and in combination.

Authors:  Francesca Cagnoni; Christian Achiri Ngu Njwe; Augusto Zaninelli; Alessandra Rossi Ricci; Diletta Daffra; Antonio D'Ospina; Paola Preti; Maurizio Destro
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-08-09

8.  Effects of low dose ramipril on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and raised excretion of urinary albumin: randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial (the DIABHYCAR study).

Authors:  Michel Marre; Michel Lievre; Gilles Chatellier; Johannes F E Mann; Philippe Passa; Joël Ménard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-11

9.  Antiproteinuric effects of enalapril and losartan: a pilot study.

Authors:  Colin Thomas White; Catherine Fiona Macpherson; Robert Morrison Hurley; Douglas George Matsell
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control.

Authors:  Dion Zappe; Cheraz Cherif Papst; Philippe Ferber
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.