Literature DB >> 11823755

The effects of probenecid on the disposition of risperidone and olanzapine in healthy volunteers.

John S Markowitz1, C Lindsay Devane, Heidi L Liston, David W Boulton, S Craig Risch.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The metabolic pathways of most xenobiotics and endogenous compounds can be divided into phase 1 (oxidative, reductive, and hydrolytic) and phase 2 (glucuronidation, sulfate conjugation, glycine and glutathione conjugation, and acetylation and methylation) processes. Oxidative metabolism by the cytochrome P450 system has been intensively investigated compared with glucuronidation and other conjugation pathways. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the disposition of olanzapine or risperidone in healthy volunteers with and without coadministration of the uridine diphosphoglucuronate-glucuronosyltransferase inhibitor probenecid. We hypothesized that olanzapine disposition would be altered as a result of decreased glucuronidation, whereas risperidone disposition would be relatively unaffected.
METHODS: Our objective was to investigate whether this interaction would occur in 12 healthy volunteers, aged 22 to 42 years, who participated in a single-dose, randomized, 4-period, double-blind, crossover study receiving a single dose of either 5 mg olanzapine or 1 mg risperidone with and without 500 mg probenecid (8 doses over 4 days). Multiple blood samples were analyzed by means of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry or HPLC to assess the 48-hour time course of risperidone and olanzapine. Urine was assayed for free and glucuronidated drugs.
RESULTS: When olanzapine was administered with probenecid, statistically significant differences were observed between plasma pharmacokinetic parameters compared with olanzapine administered alone (maximum concentration, P <.05; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours, P <.01). Clearance was not significantly different between the treatment phases. Risperidone pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different (all parameters, P >.05).
CONCLUSION: Inhibition of uridine diphosphoglucuronate-glucuronosyltransferase appeared to influence the disposition of olanzapine but not risperidone. Phase 2 metabolism may significantly influence the disposition of antipsychotic drugs and may be an important aspect of the variability in metabolism, participation in drug-drug interactions, and clinical response to some antipsychotic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11823755     DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2002.119815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  12 in total

1.  Olanzapine metabolism and the significance of UGT1A448V and UGT2B1067Y variants.

Authors:  Kathryn Kelly Erickson-Ridout; Junjia Zhu; Philip Lazarus
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Clinically significant drug interactions with atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  William Klugh Kennedy; Michael W Jann; Eric C Kutscher
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of the selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024(Enobosarm) with itraconazole, rifampin, probenecid, celecoxib and rosuvastatin.

Authors:  Christopher C Coss; Amanda Jones; James T Dalton
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Interactions between the cytochrome P450 system and the second-generation antipsychotics.

Authors:  Trevor I Prior; Glen B Baker
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Population pharmacokinetics analysis of olanzapine for Chinese psychotic patients based on clinical therapeutic drug monitoring data with assistance of meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anyue Yin; Dewei Shang; Yuguan Wen; Liang Li; Tianyan Zhou; Wei Lu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Does olanzapine warrant clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring in schizophrenia?

Authors:  Erin Schwenger; Jane Dumontet; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Advancement of structure-activity relationship of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 interactions.

Authors:  Li Xing; Yiding Hu; Yurong Lai
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of oseltamivir combined with probenecid.

Authors:  Mark Holodniy; Scott R Penzak; Timothy M Straight; Richard T Davey; Kelvin K Lee; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Dennis W Raisch; Francesca Cunningham; Emil T Lin; Noemi Olivo; Lawrence R Deyton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Combination chemotherapy for influenza.

Authors:  Elena A Govorkova; Robert G Webster
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 5.818

10.  Genetic determinants of variable metabolism have little impact on the clinical use of leading antipsychotics in the CATIE study.

Authors:  Iris Grossman; Patrick F Sullivan; Nicole Walley; Youfang Liu; Jeffrey R Dawson; Curtis Gumbs; Andrea Gaedigk; J Steven Leeder; Joseph P McEvoy; Michael E Weale; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.